- Messages
- 14,015
- Reactions
- 57,157
If it was only a dollar. My last box of 378 Weatherby was 140.00 for 20.
Im just talking the pointy thing that comes out the front. A box of 50 Barnes TTSX is about $45.
Last Edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If it was only a dollar. My last box of 378 Weatherby was 140.00 for 20.
I have no problem hunting with a $17 box of Rem corlokt. Thing is, I've taken it to the range and tested/zeroed it in the gun. No concerns.
Only time I went expensive on ammo was on a bear hunt in Alaska. Figured big hunt should use better ammo.
Gotta admit, those sloped cartridge shoulder's desgined by Roy Weatherby sure look good!If it was only a dollar. My last box of 378 Weatherby was 140.00 for 20.
I have no problem hunting with a $17 box of Rem corlokt. Thing is, I've taken it to the range and tested/zeroed it in the gun. No concerns.
Only time I went expensive on ammo was on a bear hunt in Alaska. Figured big hunt should use better ammo.
378 can't be made from H&H brass. It is a uneque case. I load 117 grains of 3031 as I remember, gives me close to 3200 FPS @ 270 grains and over 6000 ft lbs of energy. Nothing quite compares..375 bullets can run more the a buck easy! Its also not easy to find quality Weatherby ammo that isn't super expensive, so that one requires hand loading from fire formed Holland&Holland brass. Interestingly, .375 H&H quality ammo preforms almost as good, but with out the super stiff recoil of over 55 foot pound to the shoulder!
Amen buddy!!!
Amen buddy!!!
ive killed more animals with cheap remington corelokts than any of the ones ive killed with my handloads
i also sight in with the ammo im going to use.
sorry if this happened to you!!
ive killed more animals with cheap remington corelokts than any of the ones ive killed with my handloads
i also sight in with the ammo im going to use.
sorry if this happened to you!!
It always makes me feel better when I miss a critter while using the most expensive ammunition available. Heck, if I can't hit it with that stuff it just can't be done!
Groups don't matter as much as a good zero, but dang if I don't like accurate rifles :
View attachment 416300
View attachment 416301
My 100 year old hunting rifle is't the most accurate around, but she's always zeroed in and ready to go:
View attachment 416302
1 shot 1 kill works for me...
378 can't be made from H&H brass. It is a uneque case. I load 117 grains of 3031 as I remember, gives me close to 3200 FPS @ 270 grains and over 6000 ft lbs of energy. Nothing quite compares.
Because at the end of the day, not all of us go out with a 40000$ truck, a 1000$ rifle, and 500$ glass. Sometimes, it's a used Dodge, a 300$ Ruger, and a VXI that got pulled off a different rifle. Sometimes, children, bills, food, and gas take the priority over expensive ammo or the time needed to handload.
I get what you are saying Larry, and I'm sorry your .243 choked on the cheap yellow and green. But sometimes why is as simple as because that's what we had when we needed it...
For me,
Its all about getting a R.O.I. Time and energy is also important when you have already invested a lot!
Green & Yellow, scare a fellow!
cheap factory ammo is a whole lot more accurate than expensive premium "match" grade ammo that was never sighted in. If you miss at 240 yards, its because you don't know your gun or your ability.
Reminds me of a guy I used to hunt with. Not a gun guy at all, just a hunter. He used a beat up commercial mauser in 30-06. He attempted to restock it himself once and left the corners on the forend. Regardless, dude is a straight up killer. He gets his blacktail every year.
We were on our way out and he saw a twig that looked weird or some crap, so he had me stop the rig. He grabs his 2xMauser and walks up an overgrown road. He gets all sneaky looking and this buck spooks. No schit, the dude runs the deer down and caps it from the hip.
He sets his rifle down to admire his buck and Im standing there not knowing whether to schit or go blind because of what I just saw. I pick up his rifle and eject 3 cartridges. One is a 220gr roundnose, one was core-lokt of unknown weight, one was federal blue box of unknown weight.
I says to the guy, "dude, these are all different!" He looks all concerned and says, "I coulda swore they all said 30-06!"
All this as Im standing in $300 boots, $400 camo, $800 binos, $400 rangefinder, $250 pack, $1200 rifle, $500 scope, and three tyranosaurus magnum cartridges, unfired of course, in my gun.
Remington has always been the gold standard in ammunition in my world. We have 30 Remington cal corelock ammo that my dad bought in the early 50's that still shoots fine. It was never as cheep or inconsistent as something like Federal or even Winchester. RP brass has always been popular with reloaders. I have had trouble with Core locked bullets driven at high velocity coming apart on game when shot at close range but I had the same problem with Hornaday premium bullets prompting my change to Nosler Partitions many years ago. There have been lots of changes in bullet technology in the over 50 years I have been shooting. Today I am partial to Barnes copper bullets after using them in lead free California on boar. They are not inexpensive either (the Noslers used to be 5X what a Hornaday cost) but the small amount of actual shooting done with hunting ammo the cost is minimal.