- Messages
- 591
- Reactions
- 415
RE: Carry in a Post Office... I wouldn't recommend doing it openly- you will get hassled, possibly charged and arrested. However, you almost certainly won't be convicted. You can mail (post) a firearm. You cannot post a handgun, but you can certainly mail a long gun. There is no verbiage in the rules on carrying a firearm to differentiate between long gun or handgun. I say this to point out it supports the following points:
The rule that people refer to applies to postal service employees. It's part of the Code of Federal Regulations (Code of Federal Regulations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) not a law passed by Congress (The United States Code United States Code - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia). It applies to the areas of the Post Office that are off-limits to the public anyway.
"Federal building" is not a Post Office. Not all Federal properties are illegal to cary in... for example, National Forest and National Parks legally follow state law, and Military Bases follow the Base Commander's discretion. this rule is mainly meant o prohibit firearms in courts- most federal buildings are courthouses and the justice system deals with criminals- they don't want extraneous firearms there.
Lawsuit Filed Against Post Office Gun Ban
https://www.usps.com/ship/can-you-ship-it-internationally.htm
As an FFL, I can mail a handgun. Anybody can mail an unloaded rifle or shotgun (they recommend registered mail). Since it clearly says I can do that on Postal Property, that means I MUST be able to carry it on Postal Property. There's a great deal of confusion about this point, and I would hesitate to be the one to make a huge test case of it, but only for practical reasons, not for philosophical or legal ones. The website I'm seeing now are showing the verbiage about carrying weapons "for offical purposes" but the last time I was able to find the actuall Postal Service reg, it said "for lawful purposes". Which is a big difference.
Bottom line, you WILL get hassled and probably arrested, it'll ruin your day if it is noticed, but it can't possibly be illegal.
The rule that people refer to applies to postal service employees. It's part of the Code of Federal Regulations (Code of Federal Regulations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) not a law passed by Congress (The United States Code United States Code - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia). It applies to the areas of the Post Office that are off-limits to the public anyway.
"Federal building" is not a Post Office. Not all Federal properties are illegal to cary in... for example, National Forest and National Parks legally follow state law, and Military Bases follow the Base Commander's discretion. this rule is mainly meant o prohibit firearms in courts- most federal buildings are courthouses and the justice system deals with criminals- they don't want extraneous firearms there.
Lawsuit Filed Against Post Office Gun Ban
https://www.usps.com/ship/can-you-ship-it-internationally.htm
As an FFL, I can mail a handgun. Anybody can mail an unloaded rifle or shotgun (they recommend registered mail). Since it clearly says I can do that on Postal Property, that means I MUST be able to carry it on Postal Property. There's a great deal of confusion about this point, and I would hesitate to be the one to make a huge test case of it, but only for practical reasons, not for philosophical or legal ones. The website I'm seeing now are showing the verbiage about carrying weapons "for offical purposes" but the last time I was able to find the actuall Postal Service reg, it said "for lawful purposes". Which is a big difference.
Bottom line, you WILL get hassled and probably arrested, it'll ruin your day if it is noticed, but it can't possibly be illegal.