Silver Supporter
- Messages
- 9,118
- Reactions
- 16,644
He's prolly a dang good fisherman !Are you one of those guys that always adds two extra inches ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's prolly a dang good fisherman !Are you one of those guys that always adds two extra inches ?
Northwest Armory has Blazer Brass 9mm for 9.50/box right now. $190/1000.
in my small guns, I find the 40 has more of a push and the 9 is more snap - but change the 9s bullet weight from 115 to 147 and that can change the feels too.
I got into 40 back when the po-po all went for it -early 90s. One of my thought was if SHTF, where will you pick up ammo? = off the dead cops. And, if it is right for LEOs then it is right for me.
A couple years back, you could find 40 on the store shelves, but not 9.
I think the current 9mm offerings are much better - ~30 years later.
He's prolly a dang good fisherman !
As 9mm performance has improved, so has the .40 S&W.
So, the 40 S&W will always be a better cartridge than the 9mm, everything else being equal.
In the old days, we looked for increased performance at any cost. A 9mm-size pistol shooting .40 S&W with a whole bunch more power than a 9mm? That's what we were talking about. Then the .40 S&W got the tag 40-short and weak. Really? At the same time folks were hating the .40 cuz it hurt their hands to shoot.
There will never be agreement of what's best. Seems to me many folks are rationalizing taking a step backwards to satisfy comfort. That's okay too, but don't rationalize a lesser cartridge is just as good.
And having guns chambered in all the potentially available chamberings? Pretty smart. I also saw for sale, .40 ammo when I couldn't find 9mm ammo. And visa-versa.
WAYNO.
I'm afraid to ask @StomperMan, what does .45acp or 10mm do??
Depends on the gun. They have to be .40S&W pistols that were designed for the .40S&W, and not a 9mm rechambered for the .40S&W. Glocks in .40S&W, the S&W Shield, Beretta 96A1,... not so great. The SIG P229 was made for the .40S&W. Ruger P-Series can handle the .40S&W.
+1 4013+1, SW 4006
I think I am an endangered species. The 40 S&W guy. I hear all of the criticism about the cartridge, and none of it matters to me. I've carried it off and on since I was 22 and have a lot of confidence in it. Here is my take:
Yes, its a bit more "snappy" than 9mm or 45, but I think this is way overstated. I find it very controllable and I have competed with it and done pretty well. I have used the G22 and G17 in competition and find that how I feel on a particular day or a host of other factors have a greater impact on my shooting than the difference in cartridges.
Yes, service life is 2/3 of what you'd expect out of a 9mm or 45. Thats still 20 or 30k rounds. No big deal, thats still a really long time. I had a 257 Weatherby that showed a decent amount of throat erosion at 1200 shots. But, to me, the performance was worth it.
Yes, 40 usually has a round or two less in the magazine than a 9mm. But, it will have three to five more rounds than an comparable 45. If you can, in good conscience, feel like you have enough firepower in a 45, a 40 should be plenty.
Yes, 9mm now has the benefits of new wonder bullets. So does 40 at the same or greater velocity with a greater cross section and more bullet weight.
I only paid $21 for a box of 50 Federal 165 HST today. $14 a box for Remington UMC FMJ. Not much more expensive than 9mm and cheaper than 45.
Yessir, I like me some 40.
+1, SW 4006
Depends on the gun. They have to be .40S&W pistols that were designed for the .40S&W, and not a 9mm rechambered for the .40S&W....
Don't think so. It's still very popular with police all over. I own and shoot 40 S&W, 9/10mm, 45 ACP - been a 45 guy for decades but shoot the 40 as well as or better than any other. 10mm is the round just barely hanging on.I'll be the a-hole here and say that it's a novelty round and nothing more than a cut-down 10mm for recoil sensitive folks...
Just sayin.