- Messages
- 5
- Reactions
- 4
Daily carry is a .40S&W M&P 2.0 with night sights off of an M&P Pro and cerakoting by Buster Beaver. Excellent shooter and 100.00% reliable. It's like a Glock minus all that ugly and all that 2x4.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Daily carry is a .40S&W M&P 2.0 with night sights off of an M&P Pro and cerakoting by Buster Beaver. Excellent shooter and 100.00% reliable. It's like a Glock minus all that ugly and all that 2x4.
Most of the police trade-ins are .40'sDon't think so. It's still very popular with police all over. I own and shoot 40 S&W, 9/10mm, 45 ACP - been a 45 guy for decades but shoot the 40 as well as or better than any other. 10mm is the round just barely hanging on.
I think I am an endangered species. The 40 S&W guy. I hear all of the criticism about the cartridge, and none of it matters to me. I've carried it off and on since I was 22 and have a lot of confidence in it. Here is my take:
Yes, its a bit more "snappy" than 9mm or 45, but I think this is way overstated. I find it very controllable and I have competed with it and done pretty well. I have used the G22 and G17 in competition and find that how I feel on a particular day or a host of other factors have a greater impact on my shooting than the difference in cartridges.
Yes, service life is 2/3 of what you'd expect out of a 9mm or 45. Thats still 20 or 30k rounds. No big deal, thats still a really long time. I had a 257 Weatherby that showed a decent amount of throat erosion at 1200 shots. But, to me, the performance was worth it.
Yes, 40 usually has a round or two less in the magazine than a 9mm. But, it will have three to five more rounds than an comparable 45. If you can, in good conscience, feel like you have enough firepower in a 45, a 40 should be plenty.
Yes, 9mm now has the benefits of new wonder bullets. So does 40 at the same or greater velocity with a greater cross section and more bullet weight.
I only paid $21 for a box of 50 Federal 165 HST today. $14 a box for Remington UMC FMJ. Not much more expensive than 9mm and cheaper than 45.
Yessir, I like me some 40.
I am an awesome fisherman!
I think I am an endangered species. The 40 S&W guy. I hear all of the criticism about the cartridge, and none of it matters to me. I've carried it off and on since I was 22 and have a lot of confidence in it. Here is my take:
Yes, its a bit more "snappy" than 9mm or 45, but I think this is way overstated. I find it very controllable and I have competed with it and done pretty well. I have used the G22 and G17 in competition and find that how I feel on a particular day or a host of other factors have a greater impact on my shooting than the difference in cartridges.
Yes, service life is 2/3 of what you'd expect out of a 9mm or 45. Thats still 20 or 30k rounds. No big deal, thats still a really long time. I had a 257 Weatherby that showed a decent amount of throat erosion at 1200 shots. But, to me, the performance was worth it.
Yes, 40 usually has a round or two less in the magazine than a 9mm. But, it will have three to five more rounds than an comparable 45. If you can, in good conscience, feel like you have enough firepower in a 45, a 40 should be plenty.
Yes, 9mm now has the benefits of new wonder bullets. So does 40 at the same or greater velocity with a greater cross section and more bullet weight.
I only paid $21 for a box of 50 Federal 165 HST today. $14 a box for Remington UMC FMJ. Not much more expensive than 9mm and cheaper than 45.
Yessir, I like me some 40.
I have as my nightstand gun a Charter Arms Pitbull in .40 S&W. Then my only 40 semiauto was a Walther PPX (Like it a lot better than my 9 MM PPX). I use the 40 PPX in a advanced course last year. It performed well above it's price point, a keeper. I have now a second auto in 40. A Springfield XD40 SC Mod 2.... in stylish FDE. I have not shot it yet, but have received the extra magazines from Springfield. Got to get out there. (I EDC a 357 Sig, G-33)
I want a full size M&P 2.0 in 40 and FDE, I feel like the M&P was designed for 40 S&W and might last a little longer.
Double Tap Ammunition Ballistics
Round Type Weight Muzzle Energy ft·lb Muzzle Velocity ft/sec.
9mm +P TAC-XP 80 433 1560
9mm +P TAC-XP 115 445 1275
9mm +P Bonded Defense™ JHP 124 473 1310
9mm +P JHP 124 473 1310
9mm +P FMJ FP 147 421 1135
9mm +P JHP 115 511 1415
9mm +P JHP 147 410 1125
Plenty of 9mm ammo over 463 fpe.. Just one example.
Depends on when this guy did his study.A gunwriter/physician (Dobbs is his name, I think) said in his experience with gunshot wounds, .40 definitely caused more damage than 9mm or .380, as might be expected.
Depends on when this guy did his study.
Federal HST ammo, for instance takes 9mm (non +P), .40 and .45 and pretty much makes it even.
This is the new "wonder ammo" that is tipping the scales.
I believe that is HST in the first pic you see under the link.
http://www.luckygunner.com/labs/self-defense-ammo-ballistic-tests/
124 HST non +P seems to do the job.
.40 is a proven roundI think I am an endangered species. The 40 S&W guy. I hear all of the criticism about the cartridge, and none of it matters to me. I've carried it off and on since I was 22 and have a lot of confidence in it. Here is my take:
Yes, its a bit more "snappy" than 9mm or 45, but I think this is way overstated. I find it very controllable and I have competed with it and done pretty well. I have used the G22 and G17 in competition and find that how I feel on a particular day or a host of other factors have a greater impact on my shooting than the difference in cartridges.
Yes, service life is 2/3 of what you'd expect out of a 9mm or 45. Thats still 20 or 30k rounds. No big deal, thats still a really long time. I had a 257 Weatherby that showed a decent amount of throat erosion at 1200 shots. But, to me, the performance was worth it.
Yes, 40 usually has a round or two less in the magazine than a 9mm. But, it will have three to five more rounds than an comparable 45. If you can, in good conscience, feel like you have enough firepower in a 45, a 40 should be plenty.
Yes, 9mm now has the benefits of new wonder bullets. So does 40 at the same or greater velocity with a greater cross section and more bullet weight.
I only paid $21 for a box of 50 Federal 165 HST today. $14 a box for Remington UMC FMJ. Not much more expensive than 9mm and cheaper than 45.
Yessir, I like me some 40.
I earned a Distinguishrf Graduate Award from Front Sight Training Academy with a Sig P 229.The study conducted during the civil war still stands today(confirmed by recent stidies as well) The best results come from rounds .40 or greater and 180 grains and up. I carry nine and am quite confident that shot placement is the largest factor. .40 is best in guns with 4 inch barrels and longer. It's a real handful for compact firearms. The .40 is more than many can shoot confidently, but if you can, you are better off in my opinion. I shoot different calibers and the best weapon will always be the one you have on you if you ever in the position to need it. Don't get caught up in caliber wars. Train with your weapon for proficiency and confidence.The .40 is an optimal caliber. Going back to the Civil War studies have proven and confirmed the most effective rounds are .40 or greater and 180 grains or greater. It's all what you can s
.40 is a proven round