- Messages
- 783
- Reactions
- 511
I know everyone in the media is trying to push the nudity slant of the full body xray scanners as the only arguement against having the scanners, but what about pregnant women or women who could become preganant? ..or kids being digitally stripped and have thier pictures stored (they say they aren't,but I know firsthand the images are stored and archived in an Oracle database maintained by DHS on software developed at Sandia and with grants from the NISAC project.
Also, at risk people who have pacemakers are going to get jolted if they use induction based sensors instead of xrays. I bet we will see fetal death rates and birth defects go up as well as cancer for people who get blasted many times a year.
Those who argue for it simply say "you have the right not to fly" - that impedes on my right to travel freely. I'm not taking a cab or bus to Cancun - sorry.
I can't believe no one is willing to stand up and fight against this. ACLU? anyone? It's over people. From traffic cameras, to body scans, to cavity searches and all the media does is interview people who everytime say the same glassy eyed crap. "If it makes me safer - I guess I'm OK with it)
Also, at risk people who have pacemakers are going to get jolted if they use induction based sensors instead of xrays. I bet we will see fetal death rates and birth defects go up as well as cancer for people who get blasted many times a year.
Those who argue for it simply say "you have the right not to fly" - that impedes on my right to travel freely. I'm not taking a cab or bus to Cancun - sorry.
I can't believe no one is willing to stand up and fight against this. ACLU? anyone? It's over people. From traffic cameras, to body scans, to cavity searches and all the media does is interview people who everytime say the same glassy eyed crap. "If it makes me safer - I guess I'm OK with it)