- Messages
- 1,310
- Reactions
- 911
The courts argument is: There must be an unimpeded method of carry available. It does not necessarily need to be concealed, actually, up to now, the rulings have been, if you license concealed carry, you must allow unlicensed OC. Read: In re BRICKEY.
This particular ruling was in Idaho in 1902, Ohio ruled the same, and where the question has come up, state supreme courts normally go this route.
Understood, but I disagree. The state deciding that since they allow one "unimpeded method of carry", they are allowed to "Infringe Upon" the others? No thanks. I'll stick with "Shall Not Be Infringed". Finding what to me is a "sneaky" way of infringing is still an infringement.