Geez, knives and hatchets are untraceable, seems to me Dick Tracy managed to solve crimes committed with those weapons
Are you saying she made a untraceable firearm, committed a crime, and then kept said untraceable firearm for evidence?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Geez, knives and hatchets are untraceable, seems to me Dick Tracy managed to solve crimes committed with those weapons
Are you saying she made a untraceable firearm, committed a crime, and then kept said untraceable firearm for evidence?
I loved that show, I watched the reruns around noon on weekdays i think it was on channel 12This is the plot of a 1960's B&W Perry Mason case where the murder had access to two identical pistols he or she (I don't remember) swapped barrels between the two guns killed the victim then swapped the parts back. This then shifted blame to the owner of the other pistol (Perry Masons client).
I own a Remington R1 .45ACP it is a copy of a Colt 1911-A1 I could easily buy a 9mm slide and barrel for it and shoot someone with the 9mm barrel then feed the barrel, slide and magazine used into my 2 X 72 9600 FPM belt grinder and in maybe a min with a fresh 36 grit Ceramic Belt have nothing but a pile of metal dust mixed in with the 20lbs of metal dust in the bucket under my belt grinder.
Police ask for my pistol and its not the same caliber so obviously its not the one used to kill victim who ever.
She did the same thing buying the parts on line only she used the same caliber I assume. And she didn't feed the dirty parts into my belt grinder. Most likely the Willamette river.
Circumstantial evidence gets people convicted too. I don't think it's right but it happens.How can somebody be tried and convicted, without any evidence? Am I the only person not understanding this? Is this like the Kavanaugh hearings? I thought Our law system was innocent until proven guilty?
Maybe the MEDIA has something to do with this? DA'S not doing there job?
Also Juicy S. Mullet case. MEDIA?
I just don't understand?
She should have wiped all the evidence with a cloth.She should have consulted Hillary and asked the best way to "suicide" people.
She lied about where she was and they had video of her car near the husbands workplace.So.....what's the take-away here....it's supposed to be illegal to repair a firing pin.? re-place a damaged/shot-out barrel? Repair a damaged slide?
Don't they still have to prove their suspect actually pulled the trigger, and not just owned the gun.
If her husband drowned in the family pool .... even if they could prove she owned the pool and changed the Ph and added chlorine ....wouldn't they need to prove she intentionally held him under water?
She should have wiped all the evidence with a cloth.
They didn't track a firearm back to her. That is one major reason why KATU is doing a disservice to Oregonians by playing up this untraceable BS. We should educate KATU on this with some letters since they removed any opportunity for comments on their stories.Obviously it wasn't untraceable, otherwise they wouldn't have tracked it back to her...
There's nothing untraceable about the Internet.I believe that is what she did too. And that makes the reference to untraceable gun misleading. Now that KATU has made it out like a untraceable firearm was used the antis are going to use this as justification for passing SB 978-5 and it has already started:
View attachment 571881