- Messages
- 9,533
- Reactions
- 5,069
So if their argument is that you must have the officers consent to record audio of them, then the Police would also need the citizens consent to record audio of the citizen... or are we seeing a complete lack of equality between two American's & instead seeing prejudicial preference.
However there is a burden of intimidation upon the citizen more than the officer in most cases, since it is the citizen that is 99% of the time having to prove they are innocent, not the Officer. Questioning someone's innocence is a form of intimidation especially when they say things like "if you have nothing to hide, let me see". I can see a can of worms that was already open but now its the police that have to dine on them.
Innocent until proven guilty by a jury of your peers is DOA these days