- Messages
- 23
- Reactions
- 13
To bad Alex Baldwin wasn't here? He could fugue it out?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agreed. The brass goblins can wait instead of annoying range users by trawling the area with their lightbars on to try and compel the shooters to leave. I think most everyone would agree that the tweakers were in the wrong until OP made his comment about how he would've killed them if he (legally) could have. If your response to someone annoying you is to want to kill them you need to seek mental health treatment ASAP.I would have sided with the OP until he said he'd have shot them dead right there if there would have been no consequences. Yikes. That old couple sounds about as annoying as they come.
Yeah whats the legality on someone issuing a death threat after someone else attempts to spall them? Is that attempted murder?Biggest issue here from my perspective is the target shooter received a death threat. Alone in the wood at night with with no witnesses, that could easily be followed up on in the future and most likely remain unsolved.
Guy just as easily could have popped the people in question and been in the same scenario.
Being out in the woods far enough away from society that you only run into a handful of people can be a very dangerous situation. That "in-between" distance of being immersed in society and being way out of the way where no-one else is. Won't be surprised based on the OP if that doesn't end in a homicide in the future.
Generally speaking two idiots getting into conflict is where a lot violence stems from anyway.
Any self defense claim will have to question how it started and who did that. The odd couple may have been weird and unsettling, but the OP fired shots near them. No "I'm fearing for my life etc". IMO -at fault.Yeah whats the legality on someone issuing a death threat after someone else attempts to spall them? Is that attempted murder?
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT!!!???
Sometimes I wonder about me. You'd think English wasn't may first language! And you have to know typing was never attempted by me until we got my Dad 'n laws old 486. And I still haven't caught on!I wasn't talking about your misspelling (brass vs. bras), although that's funny, too.
$195.00/pound for turning in spent brass is pretty righteous! Where do I go to get that price?
The structure of your sentences is a bit unclear to me, but how I am interpreting it is the shooter being charged with attempted murder, is that right?Yeah whats the legality on someone issuing a death threat after someone else attempts to spall them? Is that attempted murder?
To be fair, prosecutors can be quite creative when they want to, and in Oregon may be willing to be, when a case involves guns.The structure of your sentences is a bit unclear to me, but how I am interpreting it is the shooter being charged with attempted murder, is that right?
Huge stretch to claim shooting a target is an attempt to harm the other people. Like - ridiculous stretch.
The law/courts have specific criteria t what classifies as 'attempted murder.'
Many grievous attacks on another person still fall under the assault category, or assault with a deadly weapon, and that's assuming the 'victim' was even harmed, which in this case, they weren't.
Just as a general point though. Telling other people "I'm going to kill you." Is not protected under the first amendment.
There has to be some assumed responsibility on both ends. On the shooter's end that if he is aware of someone down range at ANY time, he withholds from firing.Huge stretch to claim shooting a target is an attempt to harm the other people. Like - ridiculous stretch.
The law/courts have specific criteria t what classifies as 'attempted murder.'
I'm a little confused after reading your postYou know why :
Walmart is tightening open carry - Guys like this
Oregon carry is capital is now a problem - Guys like this
Hey, its your right to own a firearm. It is not your right to shoot it in public.
When you are on any place but your own property, or paid range, and you decide to shoot?
It will be in public occupied spaces.
Shooting in the direction people are at, is why laws get put in place.
Damn, glad I am old now. If I was 20 id never be able to have what I do, thanks to nimrods like this.
Oh well no one cares, especially this guy. Wait until they require permits to shoot on public land.
And require training to do so, because of guys like this.
Rant Over.
Argus.
While this might be true, I'm sure this guy was well aware of the law. The fact he was shooting past dark proves he doesn't care. The law is only good when there's someone around to enforce it. Otherwise it's about as effective as a gun free zone sign, another thing to ignore. Idiots like him aren't thinking about life in a concrete cell when they do crap like that. Same when they tell people online about how they "would have killed them." Peak entitlementYou know why :
Walmart is tightening open carry - Guys like this
Oregon carry is capital is now a problem - Guys like this
Shooting in the direction people are at, is why laws get put in place.
Tech savvy Leftists love to do this kind of thing on Right sites, screenshot it, then immediately go to ISP's, platform providers etc and demand takedown. They used to try that crap all the time at Redstate when I was a mod there...Its too easy to dismiss as a false flag, but mentioning a very well known …brass..couple.. is just too specific. Also, why on a gun forum and not a portland general if they are they are just trying to elicit a response? Similar to them posting the story here instead of to Willy week.
"Sounds pretty strange to me"
You have been around portland right?
So people who break the existing laws, lead politicians to seek to pass more laws to be made that the people who already break the law won't follow either?You know why :
Walmart is tightening open carry - Guys like this
Oregon carry is capital is now a problem - Guys like this
Hey, its your right to own a firearm. It is not your right to shoot it in public.
When you are on any place but your own property, or paid range, and you decide to shoot?
It will be in public occupied spaces.
Shooting in the direction people are at, is why laws get put in place.
Damn, glad I am old now. If I was 20 id never be able to have what I do, thanks to nimrods like this.
Oh well no one cares, especially this guy. Wait until they require permits to shoot on public land.
And require training to do so, because of guys like this.
Rant Over.
Argus.
It is what it is, public use of a firearm falls under public use laws.So people who break the existing laws, lead politicians to seek to pass more laws to be made that the people who already break the law won't follow either?
Does that logic check out for you?
Let's not pretend that the rabid-anti liberty left cares one iota about people breaking the law. They have a goal of total disarmament, regardless.
Claiming there is not a defined political boundary is absurd.It is what it is, public use of a firearm falls under public use laws.
Lets not pretend, that there is a not defied left or right any longer.
And seriously, if one owns a firearm you should be thinking how your small actions will no doubt be blown up.
Reality, its a concept many choose to ignore.
Argus