Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How anyone using reason and critical thinking could not consider this as a distinct possibility considering the agenda of the initiative drafters and chief financial backers and proponents is beyond me.The transfer language is so specific though that unless you have every prosecutor in the state essentially committing to ignoring a key provision of law, it makes the shooting sports simply impossible, which was I think a feature, not a bug in this initiative.
Did you ever get a reply?I plan on it!
Did you ever get a reply?
.......and he would help me get it down to size, that if legislation is affecting my business it may warrant a full article, and he fully supports what I am doing...
YES!
....... use a blue gun
For the purposes of instructing kids (minors);Good letter Monica. I also have a similar situation that needs clarification. Every summer I volunteer my time, along with a retired LEO friend of mind, and spend a day at a Christian camp for kids going over firearms safety and letting the kids shoot various weapons.
My question is, under this piece of crap, I refuse to call it a law, it is permitted to lend my weapon to a minor for the purpose of instruction, but it is not permitted for me to do this anywhere other than an official shooting range. Since there is no "official" shooting range anywhere near the camp, we use an abandoned rock pit on DNR land. So, would this be against the law?
Also, we often switch between stations, so I could be running a station where some of the firearms belong to someone other than me. Again, the way I see it we would be breaking the law.
Am I correct in this, or am I seeing this wording incorrectly?
"while under the direct supervision and control"Sec. 3(4) This section does not apply to: (f) The temporary transfer of a firearm (iv) to a person who is under eighteen years of age for lawful hunting, sporting, or educational purposes while under the direct supervision and control of a responsible adult who is not prohibited from possessing firearms;
I daresay that a rock pit on DNR land would not be an established and authorized shooting range, but I could be wrong. The firearms would also need to be "kept at all times" at this 'range'.Sec. 3(4) This section does not apply to: (f) The temporary transfer of a firearm (ii) if the temporary transfer occurs, and the firearm is kept at all times, at an established shooting range authorized by the governing body of the jurisdiction in which such range is located;
Good letter Monica. I also have a similar situation that needs clarification. Every summer I volunteer my time, along with a retired LEO friend of mind, and spend a day at a Christian camp for kids going over firearms safety and letting the kids shoot various weapons.
My question is, under this piece of crap, I refuse to call it a law, it is permitted to lend my weapon to a minor for the purpose of instruction, but it is not permitted for me to do this anywhere other than an official shooting range. Since there is no "official" shooting range anywhere near the camp, we use an abandoned rock pit on DNR land. So, would this be against the law?
Also, we often switch between stations, so I could be running a station where some of the firearms belong to someone other than me. Again, the way I see it we would be breaking the law.
Am I correct in this, or am I seeing this wording incorrectly?