- Messages
- 1,447
- Reactions
- 3,149
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd click on it but my gulag doesn't allow it.oh damn, they're all on lists now. GulagPostonement.Org
How will the measures effect the FFLs operating in those counties. Can (or will) they ignore state gun restrictions?
How will these SAPOs change the way we transfer firearms at gun shows in the protected counties? It seems like these ordinances are mostly symbolic. I'm holding out hope that they have some above board benefits in protecting our gun rights. But it's difficult to see how they will protect our gun rights when the state has it's own police and prosecutorial powers that seeminly have no boundaries with in our state. Am I wrong here?
How will the measures effect the FFLs operating in those counties. Can (or will) they ignore state gun restrictions?
We are still under Federal Rules.
So no we won't Ignore restriction's. But we also have the Preemption clause .
ORS 166.170 - State preemption - 2017 Oregon Revised Statutes
2017 ORS 166.170¹
State preemption
(1)Except as expressly authorized by state statute, the authority to regulate in any matter whatsoever the sale, acquisition, transfer, ownership, possession, storage, transportation or use of firearms or any element relating to firearms and components thereof, including ammunition, is vested solely in the Legislative Assembly.
(2) Except as expressly authorized by state statute, no county, city or other municipal corporation or district may enact civil or criminal ordinances, including but not limited to zoning ordinances, to regulate, restrict or prohibit the sale, acquisition, transfer, ownership, possession, storage, transportation or use of firearms or any element relating to firearms and components thereof, including ammunition. Ordinances that are contrary to this subsection are void. [1995 s.s. c.1 §1]
Wouldn't the Preemption clause make the SAPO's pretty much fruitless. I am trying to imagine where gun rights would be protected by the SAPO's.We are still under Federal Rules.
So no we won't Ignore restriction's. But we also have the Preemption clause .
How will the measures effect the FFLs operating in those counties. Can (or will) they ignore state gun restrictions?
Wouldn't the Preemption clause make the SAPO's pretty much fruitless. I am trying to imagine where gun rights would be protected by the SAPO's.
Lets look at jurisdictions here.It just means, at least in theory, that the local agency is not going to spend resources on enforcing BS laws passed in Salem or DC. In practice, another agency (state or Federal) can and likely will enforce said
agreed.I really wish the cases in Montana and Kansas would have been appealed to the SCOTUS, particularly with the current makeup of the court. That would have been interesting.