114 = No 10+ magazines EVEN existing pre ban, in public. Only ranges, privet land or hunting

[Member 53328]

Who said carrying isn't a recreational activity?

It is in Portland.

 

[PORSCHE928S4]

It is in Portland.

Get a homeless/varmint tag and you are legit!

 

[arakboss]

I have no doubt you have a breaking point.
And no doubt you will post it here when you reach it!!!!

Let's call 4rnds my breaking point. I couldn't stand having a lower limit than the Canadians have

 

[Nick Burkhardt]

Let's call 4rnds my breaking point. I couldn't stand having a lower limit than the Canadians have

Bad Penny says that you only get TWO ROUNDS

 

[DunRanull]

I was told this by a friend and had to read it for myself. Its true as far as I can tell. Bottom line is your PREBAN 10+ round mags can not be carried or used in public. Only your privet land or a gun range. (Gun smith etc.) So all of us who carry 10+ mags risk a class A misdemeanor if we have them inserted in a gun in public. Regardless of CHL and owning them pre-ban. Camping in Eastern OR, 30rd mag in the truck gun, nope. 15 round mag of 10mm in that Glock 20SF on your chest rig camping… nope.

Here is the text from Mesure 114:
(c) In addition to either (a) or (b) of this subsection the owner has not maintained the large-capacity magazine in a manner other than:
(A) On property owned or immediately controlled by the registered owner;
(B) On the premises of a gun dealer or gunsmith licensed under 18 U.S.C. 923 for the purpose of lawful service or repair; (C) While engaging in the legal use of the large-capacity magazine, at a public or private shooting range or shooting gallery
or for recreational activities such as hunting, to the extent permitted under state law; or
(D) While participating in firearms competition or exhibition, display or educational project about firearms sponsored,
conducted by, approved or under the auspices of a law enforcement agency or a national or state-recognized entity that fosters proficiency in firearms use or promotes firearms education; and
(E) While transporting any large-capacity magazines in a vehicle to one of the locations authorized in paragraphs (c)(A) to (D) of this subsection, the large-capacity magazine is not inserted into the firearm and is locked in a separate container.
(d) The person has permanently and voluntarily relinquished the large-capacity magazine to law enforcement or to a buyback or turn-in program approved by law enforcement, prior to commencement of prosecution by arrest, citation or a formal charge.
(6) Unlawful manufacture, importation, possession, use, purchase, sale or otherwise transferring of a large-capacity magazine is a class A misdemeanor.


So as I see it as long as we have a hunting permit issued by ODF, we can be going to or from coyote or feral hog hunting. (No season or restrictions, just need a license) Only issue is driving you have to have the 10+ mag in a separate locked container. Once on foot, bike or roller skates your good to go to go condition one. Looks like the ODF may sell a few more hunting licenses each yr.


Looking for holes here. Sure hope I am wrong in what I have read but sure looks like its this way.

EDIT: Also posting as a service to those who did not see this part of 114. I was ANTI 114 from the start and never saw this part. Now we all have to live it. I get it there are a bunch of threads on 114. This topic I have not seen and its a big one.

What about non-detachable 10-round mags on a rifle like the .303 Enfield, or the SKS? Does permanent attachment to the weapon make a difference?

 

[Wood Worker]

I will not comply. there is not a democratic party of today, it is socialistic / communistic, and when people realise that people dead for the past 10 to 15 years are still voting in Oregon and elsewhere it will all work out.

 

[dinky450]

What about non-detachable 10-round mags on a rifle like the .303 Enfield, or the SKS? Does permanent attachment to the weapon make a difference?

Nope. Does not matter attached or detached

 

[wired]

Mass non-compliance is one of the options to deal with what I perceive to be clearly unconstitutional bs. The founders never intended the voting process be used to strip away rights.

There is a reason the founders didn't trust ordinary citizens with the vote. The thought of pure democracy horrified them.

 

[American123]

There is a reason the founders didn't trust ordinary citizens with the vote. The thought of pure democracy horrified them.

They were intelligent and well versed in history. The average American is a moron.

I've long said, public assistance (welfare) of any kind, should disqualify a person from voting. People who are not self sufficient should not have a say in public policy.

Cue the screeching complaints - I don't care. People who can't effectively manage their own lives shouldn't have a say in how the city, county, state, country, etc. is managed.

 

[GrayGoose]

They were intelligent and well versed in history. The average American is a moron.

I've long said, public assistance (welfare) of any kind, should disqualify a person from voting. People who are not self sufficient should not have a say in public policy.

Cue the screeching complaints - I don't care. People who can't effectively manage their own lives shouldn't have a say in how the city, county, state, country, etc. is managed.

Furthermore, no two votes should be equal. Each vote should have a weighting factor determined by qualities including IQ, criminal history, land ownership, business ownership and employees.

A moron should not have the same vote as an intelligent person.
A criminal should not have the same vote as an upstanding model citizen.
A land owner and business owner's vote should count more than an apartment-dwelling burger flipping lower class consumer.

 

[American123]

Furthermore, no two votes should be equal. Each vote should have a weighting factor determined by qualities including IQ, criminal history, land ownership, business ownership and employees.

A moron should not have the same vote as an intelligent person.
A criminal should not have the same vote as an upstanding model citizen.
A land owner and business owner's vote should count more than an apartment-dwelling burger flipping lower class consumer.

That's where it gets REALLY hairy. There are plenty of high IQ people who are dumb as hell outside of a specific domain.

 

[PORSCHE928S4]

Hunting is an interesting one as you're not allowed a 5+ mag in a semi-auto. There aren't too many bolt guns with 10+ mags.

But..... if you were to be hunting the western gray squirrel your options open up a lot !

General weapons provisions for hunting game mammals

Below are the requirements for weapons that can be used to hunt game mammals. In addition to these restrictions, some controlled hunts or special areas may have further weapon restriction.

Centerfire firearm (rifles and handguns)

It is unlawful to hunt game mammals with:

• .22 caliber rimfire (except for western gray squirrel).
• Fully automatic firearms.
• Semiautomatic rifles with a magazine capacity greater than five cartridges (except for western gray squirrel).
• Tracer or full-metal jacket bullets.
• Infrared, night vision, laser or any other sight that projects a beam to the target, including scopes with electronic rangefinders and scopes that receive information from any electronic device.

WESTERN GRAY SQUIRREl

Any rifle, handgun, shotgun, muzzleloader, or long, recurve or compound bow

 

[ValleyAR]

Dang western grey squirrel gets no rights

 

[GrayGoose]

Obviously someone in the ODFW hates Western gray squirrels. Someone must have got their nuts stolen.

 

[PORSCHE928S4]

Dang western grey squirrel gets no rights

As long as you have your license you are good to always be grey squirrel hunting !

 

[nwslopoke]

Dang western grey squirrel gets no rights

2 cents for a rabbit.

 

[slyfox]

They were intelligent and well versed in history. The average American is a moron.

I've long said, public assistance (welfare) of any kind, should disqualify a person from voting. People who are not self sufficient should not have a say in public policy.

Cue the screeching complaints - I don't care. People who can't effectively manage their own lives shouldn't have a say in how the city, county, state, country, etc. is managed.

what other rights do you want to strip from them? does this go for retired people on welfare as well? between retired and disabled you just tossed a lot of pro gun votes out. so we'll stuck with lot of tech employees. people who tend to be anti gun.

 

[slyfox]

Furthermore, no two votes should be equal. Each vote should have a weighting factor determined by qualities including IQ, criminal history, land ownership, business ownership and employees.

A moron should not have the same vote as an intelligent person.
A criminal should not have the same vote as an upstanding model citizen.
A land owner and business owner's vote should count more than an apartment-dwelling burger flipping lower class consumer.

so you all are only for 2nd amendment and none of the other bill or rights. should we bring back lords and kings while we'll at it?

 

[GWS]

 

[TTSX]

so you all are only for 2nd amendment and none of the other bill or rights. should we bring back lords and kings while we'll at it?

Established titles . Totally not a scam.