Quantcast
  1. Sign up now and join over 35,000 northwest gun owners. It's quick, easy, and 100% free!

You can't have too many .44mag revolvers.

Discussion in 'General Firearm Discussion' started by PlayboyPenguin, Mar 30, 2009.

  1. PlayboyPenguin

    PlayboyPenguin Pacific Northwest Well-Known Member 2016 Volunteer

    Messages:
    4,833
    Likes Received:
    1,744
    I picked up a "new-to-me" S&W m629-1 4" this week. I am a huge fan of .44mags and this was a great buy for just under $500. It is in amazing condition. The good thing about the used .44mags is that I do not think they get shot a lot...so it is easy to find them in really good shape.:)
     
  2. jackrocks59

    jackrocks59 tigard Member

    Messages:
    349
    Likes Received:
    14
    Love mine.
     
  3. Wierzbowski

    Wierzbowski Sherwood Member

    Messages:
    173
    Likes Received:
    5
    Is that $450? If so, great buy! It looks new.
     
  4. PlayboyPenguin

    PlayboyPenguin Pacific Northwest Well-Known Member 2016 Volunteer

    Messages:
    4,833
    Likes Received:
    1,744
    Fixed it. Price was actually $499 and that was supposed to say $500. :)
     
  5. PhysicsGuy

    PhysicsGuy Corvallis, OR Resident Science Nut

    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    155
    bah! you knew I was looking for one of these didnt you?
     
  6. asiparks

    asiparks PDX Active Member

    Messages:
    421
    Likes Received:
    120
    pfffft !! call that a Smith ?
    Why, it's silver and the grips are a funny shape.....
    Now, here's a proper Smith.....

    and another, not many of these floating around....


    :p
     
  7. The Dude

    The Dude The 206, WA Member

    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    0
    pfft...no tac rail?!

    ;)
     
  8. BigMac

    BigMac Hillsboro New Member

    Messages:
    62
    Likes Received:
    0
    THere's a reason for that. ;)
     
  9. terrylf72

    terrylf72 Portland, Oregon, United States Member

    Messages:
    641
    Likes Received:
    3

    LOL.. With an ARTILARY piece like that you dont need a Tac rail. You dont need to see your target, a couple of shots will bring down the house! :D
     
  10. rodell

    rodell Newcastle, WA Active Member

    Messages:
    399
    Likes Received:
    46
    I have a 629 in 4", 6", and 8 3/8". Concealed they are not, deadly they are. The deer are a lot more cooperative than when I hunted with my 6" Model 66.

    Bob
     
  11. PhysicsGuy

    PhysicsGuy Corvallis, OR Resident Science Nut

    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    155
    First dibs when he sells it :D
     
  12. tac

    tac UK, Oregon and Ontario. Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,035
    Likes Received:
    3,315
    I USED to have forty-seven of them, collected from 1965 to 1996....

    All gone now, except the MIB 8-3/8th inch Model 29 cared for by a friend in Oregon.

    tac
     
  13. 4Freedom

    4Freedom Boise, Idaho Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,124
    Likes Received:
    817
    I'm in the market for a new S&W or Ruger or any effective type of revolver when I go hiking during this summer. What is best suggestion for under $700? I was hoping to get a S&W or Ruger, but they are both expensive. I need one i can conceal, since I will be hikign around Pacific NW and open carry just isn't easy to do here. The revolver you have looks great and for the price. I need to figure out where I can score a deal like yours. I am weary of course buying used guns, since I don't know how much abuse they haev went through. Anyhow, I soon will be hunting around for a good deal on one of these. I assume a .454 is way overkill for using in Pacific NW in the wilderness, am I right? The ammo is a bit overkill in the price department, that is my main deterrance.
     
  14. PlayboyPenguin

    PlayboyPenguin Pacific Northwest Well-Known Member 2016 Volunteer

    Messages:
    4,833
    Likes Received:
    1,744
    I would just pick up a .357mag revolver. Something like a model 66 or 686 with a 4" barrel would be perfect....or if you want something easy to conceal, go with a model 686 with a short barrel.

    m686 4"
    686SSR.jpg

    I will admit that the gun I most use when hiking is a 10mm Glock 29 in a fanny pack.

    Glock29.jpg
     
  15. 4Freedom

    4Freedom Boise, Idaho Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,124
    Likes Received:
    817
    The glock 10mm seems like a good option. However, I consulted the person from Glock USA and he specifically told me to never use a 10mm for defense in the woods. He says he himself carries a Ruger Super Redhawk .44. This is coming from a guy that makes his money selling Glock 10mms to you. I certainly respect the honesty of the people at Glock although it was disheartening when he pushed me away from the Glock 10mm. Anyhow, I think out in the woods with an adrenaline filled animal, I'd feel most confident with 44mag or bigger and a .45ACP as a backup gun. The 8 -round .357's look real sweet , but against the beasts of the wild, I be happiest with a .44 is my main gun. Usually during these attacks it happens so quick, you don't have time for many follow up shots. If the first one doesn't get him , you are in deep crap.
     
  16. PlayboyPenguin

    PlayboyPenguin Pacific Northwest Well-Known Member 2016 Volunteer

    Messages:
    4,833
    Likes Received:
    1,744
    Did you bother to ask his reasoning behind that little pearl of wisdom? You might want to ask someone that actually has even a slight understanding of ballistics next time. :)
     
  17. 4Freedom

    4Freedom Boise, Idaho Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,124
    Likes Received:
    817
    Well, I thought the technical support people at Glock would have some knowledge. This guy seem to act like he knew what he was talking about. I am a NOOB, so I myself don't really know. He claims he would never trust his Glocks, even though he says he builds them, against a charging black bear in the woods. He says he goes with .44 MAG. What is your belief, if a black bear comes charging you from bush full speed and you have split-second to react, would you reach for 10mm glock or .44 Mag? YOu have any comparison of ballastics of high powered 10mm round vs high powered .44 Mag round? Just curious to see. I do like that you can put 15 rounds or so in a 10mm Glock, definately would come in handy with the 2 legged predators.
     
  18. PhysicsGuy

    PhysicsGuy Corvallis, OR Resident Science Nut

    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    155

    I would definitely reach for the .44 mag. But the 10mm would most likely be adequate to stop a smaller bear, some people trust it for a backpacking gun, some don't. I'm guessing its just an opinion based thing on his part, I have no clue if anyone has actually had to defend against a bear with a 10mm, but I know that plenty of people have had to with a .44 mag.
     
  19. PlayboyPenguin

    PlayboyPenguin Pacific Northwest Well-Known Member 2016 Volunteer

    Messages:
    4,833
    Likes Received:
    1,744
    As some people already know, my great uncle was kind of a big much-a-muck in wildlife preservation for the US and Canada in the '70's. He was always amazed at how people mythologize bears. They are not ungodly machines. They are animals. When he was younger and starting off he and his co-workers would routinely dispatch black bears with .38 carbines and browns with .45 carbines. A 10mm Glock, especially with 10 rounds, is going to drop a black bear like a rock and could even kill a large brown. In fact the last large brown killing I saw reported the bear being dropped by a single shot from a .45acp pistol. He used to always say he had read almost every bear report in history and he had never seen one where a bear of any type killed anyone after being shot multiple times by a .357mag or higher.