- Messages
- 18,744
- Reactions
- 45,458
But they're OK in California.Muzzle brakes are contraband in Washington!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But they're OK in California.Muzzle brakes are contraband in Washington!
The WA bill was given a lot more thought than the "model" CA laws. In WA, they put everything in there but the kitchen sink. Which I don't understand, as CA has a full-time legislature; WA is only part-time - of course with the full cooperation of the state AG's office. But you'd think those CA legislators who have full time to consider these things would've done a better job. I don't know how many times they've had to go back and add things into the original CA bill.Nope it's a lot worse than that for WA's bill vs the Oregon bill. Edit it goes so far as to specifically include the CA Shark fin grip thing, as well as thumbhole stocks, as a scary feature that makes the semiautomatic rifle an Assault Weapon, if the semiautomatic centerfire rifled can accept a detachable magazine, or even if it has a fixed magazine that "has the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds" (sounds like the SKS don't it..?)\
It is a distant cousin to the shoulder thing that goes up.Last time I checked, a muzzle device wasn't the cause of gun related crimes. But, according to the anti gunners, they somehow do...
That's a fact, commies don't give a rip about saving lives, plenty of spares.It's never been about saving lives, it's always been about strangling away your 2A rights until you're "naked" and ripe to be dominated and subjugated.
Just on "semi auto" platforms.. The Marlin 45-70 I just got has a threaded barrel and will be getting a can soon.I thought it impacted threaded barrels.
What are you looking for?
I ordered this....https://www.primaryarms.com/precision-armament-m4-72-severe-duty-5-56-compensator-1-2x28-blackWhat muzzle device are you looking to get?
They make the gun scarier.Last time I checked, a muzzle device wasn't the cause of gun related crimes. But, according to the anti gunners, they somehow do...
But, it all makes perfect sense to those who have faith that the only purpose of a firearm is to murder people. It follows very logically that any add-on part or modification that improves accuracy, rate of fire, or the ease of shooting said firearm, will by definition make that firearm more capable of filling its murderous role.Bunch of bulls**t that doesn't do anything in the slightest to curb so called "gun violence". They know it, we know it.
I didn't think they were banned as well given the fact they can legally be used on bolt actions. At least that's my understanding.I don't think they're banned. You can purchase them for bolt actions. Some companies are just over cautious, and I can't say I blame them. Not sure I'd do business with this state.
Just that if you have semiautomatic rifle that has a threaded barrel, and detachable magazine or even capacity to increase magazine size of fixed magazine; then having the parts will make the rifle an "assault weapon".so if they can be used on bolt actions then is there some kind of "evil" feature count that constitutes them illegal?
So if this only affects semi autos then why are retailers not shipping them to the state? Its odd how the item itself is not illegal its the application.Just that if you have semiautomatic rifle that has a threaded barrel, and detachable magazine or even capacity to increase magazine size of fixed magazine; then having the parts will make the rifle an "assault weapon".
Because the relevant section does saySo if this only affects semi autos then why are retailers not shipping them to the state? Its odd how the item itself is not illegal its the application.
I think most of this stuff stems from the lesser known, but much more onerous piece of garbage legislation that passed this year, 5078.So if this only affects semi autos then why are retailers not shipping them to the state? Its odd how the item itself is not illegal its the application.
That seems vague enough to give the AG broad power to put FFLs out of business at a whim. That's why it seems like a hard decision whether it's worth it to do business here at all.knowingly creating, maintaining or contributing to a public nuisance by designing, selling or marketing products that:
- Promote conversion of products into illegal products
- Market products to children
- Sell weapons to people prohibited from possessing and purchasing firearms
- Allow straw purchases
- Distribute or sell firearms to dealers known to be acting in a dangerous or irresponsible manner