- Messages
- 6,985
- Reactions
- 21,487
First. Strike the stupid, and newly reemphasized, convention of naming large capital ships (and a sub) after Presidents. There was absolutely nothing wrong with naming said ships after famous military battles, various states, or recycling famous names with tradition behind them, such as Enterprise, Wasp, Hornet, etc. Naming vessels after presidents just invites needless political rancor.
Next, no naming ships after ANY persons who were not in uniform for the armed forces and who didn't devote their lives to the service, gave their lives in service, or didn't win the first or second highest awards for valor. No future Carl Vinsons, no other USS Winston Churchill, no future Gabby Giffords, no future activist anybodies from any part of the spectrum. There's no shortage of towns and rivers and minor battles in and about the US to name auxiliary vessels after.
I agree, I can't imagine a ship called the the USS Obama gees id snap at that point I think.
No one was more disrespectful to the troops then he was.
I think to our Enemies. Seeing a name of a ship of a War Veteran, serves as a reminder we are powerful and have honor.
Having the name of a Liberal Sympathizer who is passive and wants to disarm our people sends a very bad message to the world.
Why don't we call them the Rainbow Fleet why were at it with Unicorns on the Bow.
Maybe if this gets enough press ( not holding my breath ) I criteria will be put in place by Congress as you mentioned Boats. This really chaffed my hide I worked over at Mare Island and saw many proud Marines and Navy personnel this make my skin crawl.