- Messages
- 9,533
- Reactions
- 5,069
We need to focus on the universal anti freedom background check bill, absolutely
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
well, living in rural Lewis County, I am fairly certain that my representatives KNOW how they need to vote if they want to continue as legislators...Now, those guys from King, Pierce and Snohomish counties are the ones to worry about..
Further, the Chair of that committee has not shown an inclination to hear this particular bill, so it is unlikely that it will pass this session. However, be assured that I will oppose the bill should it come up for a vote.
Thank you for writing me about SB 5737. I appreciate your prompt diligence for contacting me about this bill.
The only good thing about SB 5737 is that it has no chance to become law. This bill has been referred to the Senate Law & Justice Committee on which I serve. The majority makeup of that committee and the disposition of the chair, I expect this bill will remain bottled up in committee and die quietly, same as other gun control measures that must pass this committee.
By the same token, any House bills on gun control that pass out of the House would proceed to the Senate and be heard in Law & Justice. I would expect them to be dead on arrival.
MORE ACTION>>> But I do recommend that you contact the office of Senator Mike Padden, chair of the Law and Justice Committee to echo your remarks. Chairman Padden directs which bills are heard in his committee andwhich do not get a hearing - thus rendering them dead.
Email: [email protected], office phone: (360) 786-7606. Sen. Padden is probably the single most influential and realistic person in this legislature for stopping any gun control measures.
Just to be sure you know my position, I am 100% against any ban on assault weapons, high capacity magazines or any limitation of this sort.
You can always count on my support to oppose any measures that would limit the 2nd Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens – every single time!
Thank you for your outreach.
Pam Roach
State Senator
The specter of police going door to door obviously is the gunner nightmare come true. It does seem unconstitutional. But all three senators said they wouldnt support such a plan, either. It was in the bill by mistake.
As a militia regiment of readers pointed out, this strained credulity. Two of the lawmakers Sens. Adam Kline and Jeanne Kohl-Welles, both D-Seattle backed the same legislation twice previously, most recently in 2010. Eight House Democrats also sponsored a nearly identical bill in 2005.
Senator Kline flat-out lied to you, read a typical email. You are too naive to call yourself a journalist.
Maybe so, but I still dont think Kline lied. Because when the same bill came up in 2010, he also said then that he didnt support the home inspections.
Theres no purpose in having that clause, Kline said during a 2010 public hearing, agreeing with an NRA lobbyist who had called the police searches a gross violation of the Fourth Amendment. Kline pledged then to take the provision out of the bill.
Of course he didnt Kline co-sponsored it again this year with the same provision. I dont blame anyone for doubting him. He has, after all, put in the same alleged mistake three times now. But its also true hes on record opposing police inspections before.