Silver Supporter
- Messages
- 6,072
- Reactions
- 15,024
Yes, and if they get $100M in damages it will cost you individually about 33¢.You realize that if they win we're all picking up the tab.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, and if they get $100M in damages it will cost you individually about 33¢.You realize that if they win we're all picking up the tab.
I once had some business partners who thought that way. They spent all their time trying to make sure we didn't spend a nickel unnecessarily. That way they didn't have to think about ways we could actually increase sales and profits by thousands of dollars a week. It's easy to gripe and be negative. It's harder to be creative and positive.General principle, man. General principle.
If you or I want to be creative and positive there isn't a single thing stopping us from sending our dollars directly to the victims' families. If this goes to trial we'll be forced to pay for someone else's actions and the lawyers will get half. Sure, it might only be an insignificant amount from each American tax payer but it's not our debt to pay. Neither you nor I made that crazy a-hole pull the trigger. So yes, general principle.I once had some business partners who thought that way. They spent all their time trying to make sure we didn't spend a nickel unnecessarily. That way they didn't have to think about ways we could actually increase sales and profits by thousands of dollars a week. It's easy to gripe and be negative. It's harder to be creative and positive.
We have this thread:
National - Air Force identifies dozens of failures to relay criminal info to firearms database
they already started to correct it.
DOZENS ! It took a death to get them to even look. Systemic problem. Failure of Leadership, or
as the Navy has done, Focus on the WRONG THINGS - PC things. I bet they are 100% compliant on Transsexual Sensitivity Training.
Carrying in church wasn't illegal before, was it? I believe it was up to the church whether or not they wanted to be GFZones, which is exactly how it should be.
Carrying in church wasn't illegal before, was it? I believe it was up to the church whether or not they wanted to be GFZones, which is exactly how it should be.
Well, that goes back a-ways but I guess I was wrong in my assumption.Look at post #39 of this thread.
Sure, it might only be an insignificant amount from each American tax payer but it's not our debt to pay. Neither you nor I made that crazy a-hole pull the trigger. So yes, general principle.
I think that's what he is saying too, but the law is what it is until it's changed. Who wants to be the first test-case?Didn't read it, but I think the AG is saying his offices will not prosecute?
He also said women should have a shotgun instead of an AR. Considering my mom can't handle anything more than .308 (and .308 is pushing it for her), I don't think we should get home defense advice from the idiot either! Some folk can't handle a shotgun.I think that's what he is saying too, but the law is what it is until it's changed. Who wants to be the first test-case?
Joe Biden told me to scare off home invaders by firing my shotgun into the air... twice. I ain't taking any legal advice from that idiot either.
You and I are responsible for electing politicians that decided to close our state run mental health facilities that used to be the means to control and treat people like this in a locked down environment BEFORE they went off the rails completely. We listened to those politicians who promised us tax cuts and balanced budgets by ending these programs and we elected them. Yes, it is on us.