I skipped this whole page until just now. And here I thought it was pretty clever of me.So here's something you may not know about me, I love sprinkling my post with Easter Eggs, the more obscure the better! and this time around . . .
It was! That is the joy in Easter eggs, knowing that not everyone will find them
to your question, it is suppose to be evaluated by the SOS and AG for legality, constitutionality. you can't just get 150k signatures and make something like pedophilia law in Oregon. They are also suppose to put in the economic impacts of ballot measures etc, but they both failed to do their duties and instead of using Known statements and estimates from the states own sheriff associations the costs of millions of millions of tax payor dollars they just said data was unavailable to determine cost to taxpayers. they purposely just turned a blind eye. they need to be held accountable as well. As the oregon constitution states and case law, basically any infringement of the right to bear arms even if temporary is unconstitutional. So isnt the lack of a system in place and a BGC que of 40k a delay/infringement of my right? therefore they have a blatant dereliction of duty and have failed the elected or appointed office and caused harm to at least 40k Oregonians?
right!! but her highness brown still has emergency powers and can burn the state down for 3 more weeks!!
It DOES have a single issue, they just didn't tell us that it was to turn our right to defend our lives, those of our loved ones and countrymen, and our country itself into a privilege that can be granted or withheld by caveat of the State.
^^Meh. There are politicians that support a wide range of gun laws, all the way from NO gun laws wayyyy over to NO GUNS should be the law. And all of those politicians have a range of views on non 2a issues as well. It would be silly to point out that just about everyone on here views the 2a issues to be the most important issue, but not every on out in the world holds that same position.
And no, I will not list, debate or get into whether or not those views are more or less important, more or less constitutional or anything like that, because . . .
View attachment 1330630
#
2. Religious and non-firearm political content is prohibited
We are a single-issue organization, focused solely on bringing people together in support of the 2nd Amendment. Religious and political content is inherently divisive, hurting our cause far more than it could ever help it. This includes news-related content that our staff believes may cause division.
Going tell you right now that sometimes it does feel like I am one of the very few that care about the rules, specifically the part about " focused solely on bringing people together in support of the 2nd Amendment" but I also know that a bunch of you think I probably have a Communist flag on my garage wall
Found someIt was! That is the joy in Easter eggs, knowing that not everyone will find them
From what I've read on that Organization, they've not been very firearms friendly.
Lefty friendly, righty nottie
It could have been shot down by the courts/secretary of state on the multiple issues basis.
They probably would if one of the most powerful (formerly) lobbying and advocacy organizations in the country was working to protect firearms access in general. In the past 15 years the 2A community has done pretty good in court.
That seems unlikely, given they run on donations, but perhaps. Can you provide a reliable citation?
No it's not unlikely. I'd have thought, seeing as self protection seems like a civil liberty? It here somewhere, can't find it now though. ACLU donated $10,000.00 to get 114 passed.
www.opensecrets.org
www.aclu-or.org
Donation list:
www.portlandrecord.com
Now THAT'S a list!Donation list:
PAC details Lift Every Voice Oregon
Campaign finance records filed by Lift Every Voice Oregon in Oregon and reaggregated by The Portland Record using ORESTAR data.
Bruce
