Some on the left worry about 114 preventing them from purchasing

[3MTA3]

Candidates matter.... Is a governor required to sign a law into effect?

Maybe she will hold out until they add the part where the political opposition gets whipped and forehead branded?

 

[VinnieBoomBah]

Candidates matter.... Is a governor required to sign a law into effect?

Acording to this, no

Oregon – How a Bill Becomes a Law

Forward Together works to ensure all Oregon families have the rights, recognition and resources they need to thrive. We work with women of color and trans/nonbinary individuals and their families o…

forwardtogether.org

If the bill passes both chambers, it goes to the Governor for approval. The Governor has three choices:

1. Governor signs the bill.
2. Governor vetoes (or rejects) the bill. The House of Representatives and Senate may override the veto by a two-thirds vote of each chamber.
3. Governor takes no action. If the Governor doesn't sign the bill, but doesn't veto it, it automatically becomes the law.

While a bill is waiting for the Governor to make a decision, Forward Together leaders and supporters call the Governor's office, send emails, and participate in social media campaigns to urge the Governor to sign or veto the bill.

 

[Longwalkhome]

I chuckle at the way the world has lost its mind..

 

[Mikej]

Right. So what I'm reading is that it's ok to restrict straight white male gun ownership but as soon as a "marginalized" class is affected, it's a bad law.

How I read it is, these poor, poor marginalized humans will CONTINUE to be marginalized and discriminated against by being disallowed a fire arms permit because of their evil, sinfull, disgusting chosen lifestyles.

Not my belief in any way, shape or form.

 

[Kruel J]

Meh. There are politicians that support a wide range of gun laws, all the way from NO gun laws wayyyy over to NO GUNS should be the law. And all of those politicians have a range of views on non 2a issues as well. It would be silly to point out that just about everyone on here views the 2a issues to be the most important issue, but not every on out in the world holds that same position.

And no, I will not list, debate or get into whether or not those views are more or less important, more or less constitutional or anything like that, because . . .
View attachment 1330630

#

2. Religious and non-firearm political content is prohibited

We are a single-issue organization, focused solely on bringing people together in support of the 2nd Amendment. Religious and political content is inherently divisive, hurting our cause far more than it could ever help it. This includes news-related content that our staff believes may cause division.

Going tell you right now that sometimes it does feel like I am one of the very few that care about the rules, specifically the part about " focused solely on bringing people together in support of the 2nd Amendment" but I also know that a bunch of you think I probably have a Communist flag on my garage wall

I don't think you have a Commie flag on your wall.

I believe that people are either for or against the constitution.

 

[VinnieBoomBah]

I don't think you have a Commie flag on your wall.

I believe that people are either for or against the constitution.

So here's something you may not know about me, I love sprinkling my post with Easter Eggs, the more obscure the better! and this time around . . .

 

[Knobgoblin]

Acording to this, no

Oregon – How a Bill Becomes a Law

Forward Together works to ensure all Oregon families have the rights, recognition and resources they need to thrive. We work with women of color and trans/nonbinary individuals and their families o…

forwardtogether.org

If the bill passes both chambers, it goes to the Governor for approval. The Governor has three choices:

1. Governor signs the bill.
2. Governor vetoes (or rejects) the bill. The House of Representatives and Senate may override the veto by a two-thirds vote of each chamber.
3. Governor takes no action. If the Governor doesn't sign the bill, but doesn't veto it, it automatically becomes the law.

While a bill is waiting for the Governor to make a decision, Forward Together leaders and supporters call the Governor's office, send emails, and participate in social media campaigns to urge the Governor to sign or veto the bill.

I love that song

 

[solv3nt]

View attachment 1330646

I love that song

Old school, I like it!

 

[VinnieBoomBah]

View attachment 1330646

I love that song

Oh, for the halcyon days of our childhood!

 

[Kruel J]

So here's something you may not know about me, I love sprinkling my post with Easter Eggs, the more obscure the better! and this time around . . .

I haven't hunted for Easter Eggs since I was a kid.

 

[pdxcat]

The ACAB patch on its vest does not make me sympathetic in any way. fudge that.

 

[Kid@Heart]

Candidates matter.... Is a governor required to sign a law into effect?

No. This wasn't a bill created by the Legislature and signed by the Governor. It was an initiative started by a petition and voted into law by the People.

 

[Kruel J]

The ACAB patch on its vest does not make me sympathetic in any way. fudge that.

Matches well with the pronouns.

 

[Longwalkhome]

No. This wasn't a bill created by the Legislature and signed by the Governor. It was an initiative started by a petition and voted into law by the People.

114 should never have been put on the ballot but politicians allowed it. Voting away our constitutional rights, it's how bad politicians get around making laws.

 

[Koda]

No. This wasn't a bill created by the Legislature and signed by the Governor. It was an initiative started by a petition and voted into law by the People.

If the Governoe does t need to sign this one then in this case candidates dont matter.

But imagine if you will how they would react to a citizen approved bill that went against anything they supoort (abortion, etc.)

 

[Longwalkhome]

I read a lot and just finished another thread on this topic. In the thread a post was made that 114 will stop the mentally ill from buying guns and the leftist are afraid of being declared mentally ill by their behavior. Interesting.

 

[TTSX]

I read a lot and just finished another thread on this topic. In the thread a post was made that 114 will stop the mentally ill from buying guns and the leftist are afraid of being declared mentally ill by their behavior. Interesting.

Well, they are, so.....

 

[deadeye]

Most likely if the state decides to use the same type of form as the revised 4473 with the same questions that in itself should disqualify the person in the article. Questions 20- C, G, K should at least disqualify them from purchasing one, even if the questions on the eventual state forms for permits allow it. I tend to wonder why this person is a "former" FFL and just what that means.

 

[The Heretic]

 

[Longwalkhome]

Well, they are, so.....

Interesting part is the new background check, what information will they use that the old background check didn't?

Will they do a search of post on social media?

Will they compare pictures of "what the government decides is acceptable ".

A lot of room to make decisions on gun ownership by political beliefs.

Edited to add, right now the left believes the folks who voted for Trump are criminals and terrorist. Will a background check look for who you support in politics?