Well, Isn't it the PERSON who is responsible and NOT the weapon?
The two go hand in hand. I want less injury/death and those that cause the injury should carry the burden of the blame and the punishment.
Projection is a tool of the far left. While they're busy demonizing guns to try to ban them rather than honestly trying to save lives, they're making crazy statements like our little buddy just tried on you.
The operator you want to make sure has the absolute freedom to buy something they don't understand.
You are 'mincing' words with this statement.
heaven forbid your acronym means what it says...
No it isn't. When police NDs went up moving from revolvers to autos, was that somehow a good thing because it showed a lack of training? Or was it a bad thing because the number of NDs went up?
the problem with this is the only way to assure that is to mandate those object over others by law. Theres got to be a better way....
Someone else already claimed username "ticklemehomo"
Freedom comes with risk and you can't do anything about it.
No, you don't. Many consumer products cannot be purchased without some sort of certification from the manufacturer. No law involved.
lost me. Whats an example of that?
I'll pass.
true a decocker is a safety, or true Im the guy redefining nomenclature...
Specialized tools and materials.
Pulling a 4 lb trigger on a Glock or a 7-8 lb DA trigger would be indiscernible under fear or duress.
Supposedly. Yet NDs went up when police switched to Glocks.
still lost, they wont sell you their stuff unless they certify it?
They won't sell to someone who hasn't been certified as trained to use it.
