- Messages
- 1,799
- Reactions
- 1,225
A stupid and worthless piece by some flunky who attached a title of a "financial adviser" to his name.
What are his credentials?
In the financial world there are equities experts, bond experts, commodities experts, currency experts and then also options experts and futures experts.
No single person is an expert in all of the above. Most of these financial advisers are nothing more than salesmen for mutual funds. They follow some allocation formula and make their living selling stock and bonds mutual funds. They cannot even be considered experts in any of the specialties I've listed above.
The ones that are more knowledgeable are pretty much limited to stocks and bonds.
I'm willing to bet that this guy falls into the mutual funds salesman category, and has not even done any research followed by so critical thinking before writing this article. He makes the point that gold has no value besides that which people give it. That is true. It is also true for just about anything else. However, paper currency really has no value whatsoever. You can take a gold or silver coin from a nation or kingdom long gone and it still has value. It might be more or might be less than it was worth when it was used as money, but it still has value. Heck, I have some 20 Mark gold coins that were minted around the the turn of the 20th century. They have value today. Paper money printed by the same government is completely worthless.
He also makes an argument that gold has no cash flow, and cannot be evaluated like a corporation can. True enough. Corporations however are run by thieving individuals who drain a lot of the value from them and into their own pockets. Shareholders in many cases get no dividends, but executives get huge bonuses. Even when there is a dividend in most cases the amount is nothing more than an insult. Hardly ever do people make more than 3% in dividends.
Think about it as if the big corporation was a small business that you've bought. Would you allow management to run your corporation so that you only got 3% return from operations. Not a chance.
What are his credentials?
In the financial world there are equities experts, bond experts, commodities experts, currency experts and then also options experts and futures experts.
No single person is an expert in all of the above. Most of these financial advisers are nothing more than salesmen for mutual funds. They follow some allocation formula and make their living selling stock and bonds mutual funds. They cannot even be considered experts in any of the specialties I've listed above.
The ones that are more knowledgeable are pretty much limited to stocks and bonds.
I'm willing to bet that this guy falls into the mutual funds salesman category, and has not even done any research followed by so critical thinking before writing this article. He makes the point that gold has no value besides that which people give it. That is true. It is also true for just about anything else. However, paper currency really has no value whatsoever. You can take a gold or silver coin from a nation or kingdom long gone and it still has value. It might be more or might be less than it was worth when it was used as money, but it still has value. Heck, I have some 20 Mark gold coins that were minted around the the turn of the 20th century. They have value today. Paper money printed by the same government is completely worthless.
He also makes an argument that gold has no cash flow, and cannot be evaluated like a corporation can. True enough. Corporations however are run by thieving individuals who drain a lot of the value from them and into their own pockets. Shareholders in many cases get no dividends, but executives get huge bonuses. Even when there is a dividend in most cases the amount is nothing more than an insult. Hardly ever do people make more than 3% in dividends.
Think about it as if the big corporation was a small business that you've bought. Would you allow management to run your corporation so that you only got 3% return from operations. Not a chance.