Speaking of the lawsuit. Perhaps I've missed it.....so, why was there no mention of:
the cost to citizens (BGC, training, medical records proof, etc...) to exercise a RIGHT?
the required re-qualification for a BGC every year?
the required formal training issue?
the State's need to examine private medical records? Did the law even mention a "standard" for disqualification?
the need for a waiting period when I already own several other firearms?
Ok, Ok, ok.....I have other concerns too. But, it's a start.
Infringement is infringement. So then, requiring me to pay money and jump through hoops to exercise a RIGHT is in my opinion "unreasonable". If these same restrictions were applied to voting.....I'd bet, that the SCOTUS would say that the restrictions were UNREASONABLE.
Aloha, Mark
Can you say "Poll tax"?
There is so much that is illegal and unconstitutional in that initiative. I'm guessing that someone needs to be actually presented with that renewal "fee" before he/she can actually sue about it and get an injunction.