Gold Supporter
- Messages
- 2,894
- Reactions
- 6,934
All large companies have similar rules. They were put in place on advise from corporate counsel.
Employee's are not to challenge an attacker or even defend a coworker who is being attacked. Employee's are instructed to run away from all confrontations. The reasoning is that they want as few employees injured as possible. I can understand in retail instructing the employee to let the shoplifter take the merchandise, it is less costly than paying for the employee's injuries.
But is someone is attacking a coworker, or kidnapping a child I am going to try and stop them and I will probably be fired. So be it. The Employer would have an impossible web to negotiate in saying, it is ok to stop one situation, but not another. Too many grey area's for the legal team to negotiate.
Employee's are not to challenge an attacker or even defend a coworker who is being attacked. Employee's are instructed to run away from all confrontations. The reasoning is that they want as few employees injured as possible. I can understand in retail instructing the employee to let the shoplifter take the merchandise, it is less costly than paying for the employee's injuries.
But is someone is attacking a coworker, or kidnapping a child I am going to try and stop them and I will probably be fired. So be it. The Employer would have an impossible web to negotiate in saying, it is ok to stop one situation, but not another. Too many grey area's for the legal team to negotiate.