- Messages
- 202
- Reactions
- 165
- Thread Starter
- #21
I think you should stop typing in brown bold letters.
Just for you... I will stop using Brown...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think you should stop typing in brown bold letters.
And 50 BMG is really .51.
BFD
Hey, a 6.5 Creedmoor is not 6.5 mm
Say all, did you know that a 6.5 Creedmoor is really 6.7mm. Most do not know this.
The Creedmoor bullet by Hornady measures .264 that's 6.7 mm
6.5 mm is .2559 diameter not .264
The general understanding seams to be,that many manufactures through history have made ammo that is not really what they say, but this is pretty big by .008.
In my opinion that is not even close!
I think they should have called this the 6.7 Creedmoor. I love my Creedmoor, but it is not 6.5 MM
Larry243
yes, thanks for being attentiveold Winchester with the 41 Mag, which uses a .410 bullet.
I think you should call a Spade a Spade!
You can further confuse it by forgetting whether you measure bore diameter like an American or some pinko commie bastid from Europe. In the US, we measure in the groove. Thats why 6.5 in the US is actually .264. The .256 Newton was a 6.5 as well using .264 bullet, but was designated a .256 by being measured from the lands.
So, 7.62x39 may be .311 here measured in the groove, but measured from the lands it will probably be .308.
I think you should call a Spade a Spade! You don't call a spoon a fork!
The metric to SAE conversion is irrelevant. The bullet still fits the bore .... 3.141 x 6.5 = .2559
Gun manufacturing has screwed things up for a LONG TIME... a Spade should be a Spade. We would not like it if we found out our truck engine was 50 cubic/inches smaller.
The metric to SAE conversion is irrelevant. The bullet still fits the bore .... 3.141 x 6.5 = .2559
Gun manufacturing has screwed things up for a LONG TIME... a Spade should be a Spade. We would not like it if we found out our truck engine was 50 cubic/inches smaller.
By the origin of this saying, originating from the Greeks, you would be fine in saying this.
In the US, the phrase is often avoided due to black people being referred to as spades.
Like I was saying, we measure bore diameter different here.
Most of the mis-numbering is to avoid confusion. Like a .243 Winchester vs .244 Remington. .220 Swift vs .22-250 Remington vs .223 Remington.
What gets neat is when cartridges are renamed. .280 Remington becomes the 7mm Remington Express and then renamed again as the .280 Remington. Why not call it a .284 Remington? Maybe some genius would buy a .284 Winchester cartridge to use in their .284 Remington rifle.
The 7x57 Mauser is also the 7mm Rigby. The 30-06 is also the 7.62x63.
Confusion causes all sorts of problems in the return isle. Remington alone has the 7mm-08, 7mm Express, 7mm SAUM, 7mm Rem Mag, 7mm STW, 7mm Ultra Mag. Too bad ammo isn't refundable.
It never ends....
Well, I guess some people just have to always play the race card and be offended when they want! That's what is wrong with America today. I guess calling a Diamond a Diamond should refer to Indians!
I say get over it!
The metric to SAE conversion is irrelevant. The bullet still fits the bore .... 3.141 x 6.5 = .2559
Gun manufacturing has screwed things up for a LONG TIME... a Spade should be a Spade. We would not like it if we found out our truck engine was 50 cubic/inches smaller.
So is .221 fireball and .222 and .225. And .219 zipper....223 is really .224
.223 is really .224
So you're calling a spade a spade?Ok. Say it to a black person to their face, endure the repercussions, and then follow your own advice and get over it.