- Messages
- 6,824
- Reactions
- 17,613
I think Dick's used faulty logic when they decided to enter the lefty game of virtue-signaling.
Figuring the amount of revenue lost from 18-21 yr old's firearm sales vs the gain from anti-gun golfers and tennis players was at best a static analysis. They probably figured-in a small amount of short-lived "protest boycotts" on top of that. But what I think they failed to factor in was revenues from hunters and pro 2A people who have never bought firearms or related gear from them but spend a couple hundo every season for their kids' baseball, tennis, lacrosse, football, or other sporty-goods. Not to mention their own camping, hunting, golf, or whatever gear, clothing and shoes, boots, etc. Those (former) customers up the ante exponentially...
That's a good point about the other items hunters bought -- I know in the past I've gone in to get something or browse around, and also walked out with items for my wife. That won't be happening ever again, but there is another issue: While you can buy a gun online, it is a total hassle, whereas buying a tennis racket is as easy as hitting Amazon and having it in your hand two days later without any special arrangements. There really is no incentive to fight traffic and parking to go to Dicks for things that don't require a background check, and since their new policy, there's just no reason to even go.