Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 16,901
- Reactions
- 27,764
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
(In response, with respect)I am no fan of 114 but simply stating it was fraudulent does not make it so. Where is your proof. I hope you're right.
Its called math Democrats figured out a long time ago how to take control of a state , you don't have to control the whole state just population centers and to be honest with you . Its exactly why democracy doesn't work and wasn't intended for Americans from the get go.(In response, with respect)
This picture sure doesn't make it seem like it's legitimate. As for the "proof", it's starting to feel like gas lighting. People have a real sense that something is amiss, A natural instinct, that feeling when things just don't add up. 114 feels that way, not just because I don't like it, but it never made sense from the jump. Beyond the fact that they had no actual system in place.. just how on earth did buffoons create something and get it passed in such a hurry despite nearly the entire state voting against it? How did those small counties despite their "large" population outvote the rest of the state? Even Washington county and its massive pro gun community getting outvoted didn't make sense. The amount of folks in this county that voted against 114 is staggering.. I think many ballots were tossed due to signatures and I think there were fraudulent votes.. short of millions of dollars and time for a recount my suspicions will never be proven. But it doesn't feel right.
In time, hopefully there will be a lot that gets uncovered.. we'll see a bunch of what has currently gone on in Oregon and the US come to light.. OR we'll continue to plunge further and further into chaos.. which is where this ship seems to be headed.
View attachment 1416474
The investigation is being conducted by the very partisan AG Rosenblum who has no authority to bring or prosecute charges. Anyone who thinks Rosenblum will find any wrongdoing is fooling themselves.If you review the punishment history, it is almost non-existent from the party in power.
The anti 2A party figured out back in the 60s with Reynolds V. Sims, and got SCOTUS to basically end the whole State electoral system of having counties be represented by State Senators and instead required that State Legislature districts for both Representatives and Senators be drawn based on population under the basis of "one man, one vote" and "land doesn't vote, people do"(In response, with respect)
This picture sure doesn't make it seem like it's legitimate. As for the "proof", it's starting to feel like gas lighting. People have a real sense that something is amiss, A natural instinct, that feeling when things just don't add up. 114 feels that way, not just because I don't like it, but it never made sense from the jump. Beyond the fact that they had no actual system in place.. just how on earth did buffoons create something and get it passed in such a hurry despite nearly the entire state voting against it? How did those small counties despite their "large" population outvote the rest of the state? Even Washington county and its massive pro gun community getting outvoted didn't make sense. The amount of folks in this county that voted against 114 is staggering.. I think many ballots were tossed due to signatures and I think there were fraudulent votes.. short of millions of dollars and time for a recount my suspicions will never be proven. But it doesn't feel right.
In time, hopefully there will be a lot that gets uncovered.. we'll see a bunch of what has currently gone on in Oregon and the US come to light.. OR we'll continue to plunge further and further into chaos.. which is where this ship seems to be headed.
View attachment 1416474
By kneecapping the timber industry and impoverishing the middle class outside the Willamette Valley, thereby concentrating political power in urban areas.Its called math Democrats figured out a long time ago how to take control of a state ,
And drawing the Districts in a gerrymandering way to get more Ds than Rs in the districtsBy kneecapping the timber industry and impoverishing the middle class outside the Willamette Valley, thereby concentrating political power in urban areas.
"ma96782 didn't kill himself"RE : The vote.
Well.....I ain't gonna claim that "The Machines Tabulators" had anything to do with this.
Nor....Will I claim that "manipulation/shenanigans" took place anywhere or on any level.
Cough, cough.....it's just too risky now a days, to question the Ds on most anything.
View attachment 1416503
Aloha, Mark
PS.....but really......what do I know about OR politics? I'm more familiar with WA politics. Cough, cough.....
View attachment 1416504
Very true.The anti 2A party figured out back in the 60s with Reynolds V. Sims, and got SCOTUS to basically end the whole State electoral system of having counties be represented by State Senators and instead required that State Legislature districts for both Representatives and Senators be drawn based on population under the basis of "one man, one vote" and "land doesn't vote, people do"
Very sad but absolutely true. Criminals commit violent crimes then whoop, they're back on the street, ready to commit more.If the desire is to stop mass shootings, then we need a mental health treatment system and we need police to police and DA's to prosecute criminals.
What we've gotten with the great shamdemic is lawlessness in America. The criminals are the victims and the victims are the criminals. Forcing me to go heeled each and everyday, because my tax dollars are buying tents and needles, not keeping society safe from crime and criminals…
True, and I do want that nonsense to stop as well. But I think it'll just keep happening with the firearms and capacities we are still allowed to have.There were a lot of people that voted for 114, I know some. I think 114 is wrong but there are some that are simply getting tired of the shootings and will try almost anything to stop it with out looking down the road at the actual implications of thier choice.
Those people refuse to examine what gave rise to this morbid fantasy in the first place. Because it could be that they may have to make some changes to their own behavior. They may have to reexamine their lifestyle, and the world they have made for their kids.That's the one approach those hell bent on limiting 2A access refuse to take.
You want to make certain people unreasonable angrier?Those people refuse to examine what gave rise to this morbid fantasy in the first place. Because it could be that they may have to make some changes to their own behavior. They may have to reexamine their lifestyle, and the world they have made for their kids.