Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am not buying the 48 at all. Most VW's get 48-50 on the highway and they are better aerodynamically and lighter then the Tundras. Also the Dodge Diesel 1500 has lower HP/Torque and it's rated at 24 average MPG. No way they are squeaking 48 out of the Tundra. Esrimates are high 20's low 30's on the highway or the same as Dodge. I will say it is great to see Toyota and Nissan coming out with new Cummins powered trucks.Never owned one, but heard they are fantastic vehicles. All my friends who own them have been nothing but happy with them. I personally would prefer a Honda or Toyota based on my personal experience. Looking forward to the Toyota Tundra Diesel set to be released in 2016. It's supposed to get 48mpg (which makes sense since it's a diesel) and will have well over 300hp and over 500 lb.-ft. of torque. Woohoo!
As for the bad drivers, they seem to be the absolute worst here in Portland in general. Yes they may be polite, but are severely unskilled and oblivious to their surroundings. Then again, I come from Los Angeles where in general they are very skilled, but aggressive. To each their own.
I drive an Outback. All wheel drive, lots of space in the back for gear. MPG could be better, but it's perfect otherwise.
And it hasn't been tagged or keyed yet??
You mean the Liberal types would violently damage my car just because they disagree with me?
Maybe I should also get a "Coexist" and "Keep Portland Weird" sticker too, that will confuse them.
My 2014 outback with the 2.5 is only getting 21 city. Was hoping for 23. I got 25 mixed city/ hwy once. Haven't taken a long trip in it yet.I drive an Outback. All wheel drive, lots of space in the back for gear. MPG could be better, but it's perfect otherwise.
Mark-60, I do like that Sub!
My 2014 outback with the 2.5 is only getting 21 city. Was hoping for 23. I got 25 mixed city/ hwy once. Haven't taken a long trip in it yet.
I never gun it from a stop and drive like a mature person. Was expecting a little better.
The new ones are bigger and the engine a little bigger too but the CVT tranny is supposed to get better mpg than a stick or the previous models.My beater '90 Legacy gets better mileage than that and I drive it like it was stolen.
The new ones are bigger and the engine a little bigger too but the CVT tranny is supposed to get better mpg than a stick or the previous models.
A lot of people complain about how an engine whines with a CVT when you really step on it, and it does. But the trade off is supposed to be mpgs. I'm still breaking it in though, maybe it'll improve.
They claim 24 city and 30 hwy.
CVTs are going to be the norm for most cars in the near future I hear. The concept seems like something that will break or wear out quicker but traditional transmissions aren't bullet proof either.
I know early CVTs had some glitches. Hope they are all solved!
I've had my fill of manual shifting though. Getting lazy.
BTW on the MPGs.
MPGs stated digitally on the dash ain't always accurate. Mine tells me I'm getting 23 by fill up time pretty consistently. 21 mpgs is the real calculation though.