Staff Member
Gold Supporter
Silver Supporter
- Messages
- 8,995
- Reactions
- 31,872
Stupid games...stupid prizes. Common sense apparently isn't common.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't. I think they need to reach for them first more often.I wish the first thing these young LEOs reached for wasn't a deadly weapon. It seems to me that happens way more often than it should. There are times it is needed but not always.
She was shot when the bull saw her going for the horn.Stupid games...stupid prizes. Common sense apparently isn't common.
#2 In the position he was (outside of and also in front of the vehicle) would OC spray, a Taser, baton, bean bag or pepper ball have worked best through the glass? A car is a deadly force threat. She made it very clear that she was willing to run over and kill people to escape. The proper response is deadly force so she cannot kill any of our families out for a walk.I wish the first thing these young LEOs reached for wasn't a deadly weapon. It seems to me that happens way more often than it should. There are times it is needed but not always.
^^^ This. When she went to ram the cop with her car, she became an imminent threat to him and to other bystanders. Doesn't matter what the preceding crime was - her actions are what changed the situation from car theft to attempted murder, not the actions of the officer.Two issues here to me:
#1 Placing yourself in the potential path of a vehicle (even if it is going in a different direction from you at the time). Allowable? Certainly. Wise? Not usually, especially when spike strips are being deployed right behind you. But, I wasn't there so VERY hard to second guess his decisions. Crooks do crazy things to avoid spike strips (like run over other officers) and he may have been trying to give them more time to get them deployed. Many possibilities plus endless unknowns about the rest of the crime.
#2 In the position he was (outside of and also in front of the vehicle) would OC spray, a Taser, baton, bean bag or pepper ball have worked best through the glass? A car is a deadly force threat. She made it very clear that she was willing to run over and kill people to escape. The proper response is deadly force so she cannot kill any of our families out for a walk.
If this POS is willing to steal cars and run down LEO then they deserve a bullet rather than a day in court. Just my .02.I wish the first thing these young LEOs reached for wasn't a deadly weapon. It seems to me that happens way more often than it should. There are times it is needed but not always.
So you do not believe in our judicial system and feel vigilantism should be the norm? A police officer should not be just enforcing the law he should be judge and jury as well. Sorry dont agree.If this POS is willing to steal cars and run down LEO then they deserve a bullet rather than a day in court. Just my .02.
The bullbubblegum soft-on-crime mentality disease going around is the reason stuff like this is happening more and more these days. Punishment needs to fit the crime and maybe, just maybe, this sort of thing might be curtailed.
I doubt many if any feel that way. Many of us do feel when scum like her make the choice she made? They are now fair game to be shot. Scum like her are responsible for killing and maiming people every year. Most often they are slapped on the wrist and let out to do it again and again. So when one gets shot? I could care less. They made their bed, they can lay in it.So you do not believe in our judicial system and feel vigilantism should be the norm? A police officer should not be just enforcing the law he should be judge and jury as well. Sorry dont agree.
To a certain extent I agree - however I beleive the police were ignorant being on foot in a parking lot with someone behind the wheel of a stolen vehicle. If they had used thier cruisers this could have been done more effectively - I know I certainly would not try to stop a car by being in front or behind it. To me this was escalated to the point where deadly force was required. No, the perpetrator was far from being in the right. She did make a choice - it is up to the police to remove those choices when possible. They did not do this.I doubt many if any feel that way. Many of us do feel when scum like her make the choice she made? They are now fair game to be shot. Scum like her are responsible for killing and maiming people every year. Most often they are slapped on the wrist and let out to do it again and again. So when one gets shot? I could care less. They made their bed, they can lay in it.
The criminal committed the crime the police are supposed to arrest the criminal when they can without deadly force if at all possible, it is there responsibility to do everything they can to apprehend the perpetrator with out loss of life where possible.It is NOT the responsibility of law enforcement to "remove choices" from a criminal. It is their responsibility to uphold the law and arrest or stop criminals by whatever means necessary.
The person driving the car is who escalated the situation and made the shoot necessary. Don't put that on the police.
I do not, nor have I ever felt bad for a criminal who got shot, had their bubblegum handed to them, or worse, by LEO, while they were committing a crime or resisting arrest.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
This wasn't just about enforcing the law when he shot her. This dumpster fire of a human took it to a life and death situation. Cop responded appropriately. Cops are ordinary people put into extraordinary situations. Give them some credit and try to imagine literally being in his shoes at that moment.A police officer should not be just enforcing the law he should be judge and jury as well.