Gold Supporter
- Messages
- 24,571
- Reactions
- 37,295
- Thread Starter
- #41
oh, oh, oh, pick me I have the answer.So... whats it gonna take?
Cartridge Box
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
oh, oh, oh, pick me I have the answer.So... whats it gonna take?
The argument is rooted in hubris and arrogance. They try to turn an argument their way by presenting only part of the factual information, in an attempt to force the gullible into agreeing with their whole argument, by agreeing to only one truth. They even get the gullible to do their work for them."State Defendants object to the Court's finding that the "a magazine is a necessary component of a firearm.""
Are there any mag fed firearms that couldn't be easily modified to fire a single handloaded round without a magazine in the firearm?
Thinking about all the mag fed firearms I own, it seems like every one could be made to fire a round without the magazine installed. In some cases a mag safety disconnect would have to be removed or bypassed. You would obviously have to hand feed rounds one at a time but I could see where some might accept the State's suggestion that the magazine isn't a necessary component to fire a round.
and this is why voting does nothing, vote conservatives and your voting RINO in Oregon or voting for a turn coatProblem is the left doesn't care about SCOTUS or the original intent of the constitution. They think the BOR is a living document and they think SCOTUS is wrongfully packed conservatively.... (yet they blame conservatives that think the election was stolen as conspiracy theorists).
It shows their true colors, they wont stop just because of the law or a conservative court disagrees with them.
and the left leaning oregon voters never will read the memo'sOregon didn't get the memo.
bring back capitol punishment's for trying to overthrow the Constitution and bill of rights.So... whats it gonna take?