National Anarchists and Guns

[shibbershabber]

LBGTQ rights...

A lot will depart with you there...

Equal rights should be the goal.
Giving special attention to certain groups is divisive and anti-freedom.

Especially lbgtq... It puts things on an inevitable collision course. Like the issues with bakeries and wedding cakes.

Do 'LBGTQ' rights supercede another persons religious freedom?
Does the (T)ransgender part of that mean that schools have to allow students of one gender to use the opposite locker room?
Or being punished for challenging the idea that there are more than two genders...

These just being a couple of the issues people take with lbgtq rights.

When you talk special rights it tends to encroach on the existing constitutional rights of others.

Thats a big part of why many dont want to just 'handle it'

 

[Jonnyuma]

Thats a big part of why many dont want to just 'handle i

Ever heard an advocate for something (gay rights, BLM, whatever) say, "What people need to understand is... " and then go on to tell me what they think I "need" to understand... ?

That's where I tune out. I dont need to know or understand any of it because I'm not fighting for or endorsing their cause. Their cause, their fight

It should be self evident that discrimination and protected classes are extra-constitutional... If a group wants to infringe on another group's rights the answer is "NO".

They're free to petition for extra rights, free to lead a charge in that direction (what I meant when I said "handle it"), but the answer is "No, you may not infringe on another's rights no matter how slighted or entitled you feel." Bang your head against a wall, go on a hunger strike, "handle it" however you want within the bounds of the law and the Constitution. That doesn't mean I won't oppose you if I disagree, just don't try to goad me into being your advocate... in other words, handle it.

 

[CamoDeafie]

Nowhere in the Constitution does it say a business must provide places to relieve oneself to the public whom are not paying customers or parents

Simplest way to do this is to eliminate group restrooms and have individual, private restrooms. Or the other way.. absolute genderless restrooms for all with private stalls for all (methinks corporations and such would sooner eliminate group bathroom than to set up genderless privacy group restrooms )

 

[R3dundantC]

Nowhere in the Constitution does it say a business must provide places to relieve oneself to the public whom are not paying customers or parents

Simplest way to do this is to eliminate group restrooms and have individual, private restrooms. Or the other way.. absolute genderless restrooms for all with private stalls for all (methinks corporations and such would sooner eliminate group bathroom than to set up genderless privacy group restrooms )

The other way already doesn't work.

The best solution is colostomy bags and catheters for everyone. Followed by banning men from public places.

 

[Jonnyuma]

The other way already doesn't work.

The best solution is colostomy bags and catheters for everyone. Followed by banning men from public places.

View attachment 600838

Why would this person (lil dove) presume to assign gender roles to these two persons?

That chick ain't woke fer sh*t.

 

[Jcon268]

I'm for the gun rights for all Americans. But the red flag goes up when I see ultra extremists asking their fellow extremists to arm themselves.

"I'm a left-wing anarchist. Guns aren't just for right-wingers."

"LEFT WING ANARCHIST" HA...HA...HA.

 

[bbbass]

@AndyinEverson

 

[The Heretic]

ok - way off topic IMO

here you go:

‘If others have rifles, we’ll have rifles’: why US leftist groups are taking up arms

Armed antifascists groups say they want to protect events from other malicious and potentially armed groups – a phenomenon that is becoming more and more common

www.theguardian.com

 

[shibbershabber]

ok - way off topic IMO

here you go:

‘If others have rifles, we’ll have rifles’: why US leftist groups are taking up arms

Armed antifascists groups say they want to protect events from other malicious and potentially armed groups – a phenomenon that is becoming more and more common

www.theguardian.com

This is the problem with the right. We dont organize and train.

Sure, many of us are armed, train or were prior service/LE... Whatever.
BUT! We are not organized.

Things pretty much come down to 'put up or shut up'... currently, the left is in put up mode while we are in shut up mode.

This idea that somehow, all of us good folks on the right will snap into action when the 'time comes' and proceed to obliterate the entirety of the left, lone wolf style... because "we have the guns" or "we've been shooting all our lives" or "the other side doesnt even know which bathroom to use" or whatever cliche you want to pick.......... is bullbubblegum.

If these people decide to go to war, we are at a serious disadvantage. The above cliches are mostly true, but dont mean anything.

It doesnt take thousands of hours to educate a person on the proper use of a firearm ... in fact, thousands upon thousands of untrained drugged out losers manage to fatally put a bullet into another person every year.
You dont need to be Simo Hayha or Chris Kyle to win a gunfight, especially in urban environments.

These dickheads are arming up... they are getting organized... they are training in the same groups that they "deploy" with... they are actively working security for like minded groups all over apparently... they are getting practice in with communication, networking, intel, etc... far beyond hanging out at the range.
They are essentially paramilitary groups operating quietly and without the scrutiny of governments and with the friendly media downplaying the whole thing.

Looking at this article... Proud Boys are being called a 'violent street gang' and being lumped in with groups that are overtly white supremacist... while antifa is just out there defending the defenseless ...and these other bubblegums are fielding 'security teams' of 100 people...


This... is how powerful the propaganda is. One side can field dozens of armed 'security' without anyone batting an eyelash. Antifa can wreak havoc upon a city committing assaults, vandalism and arson with total impunity and the police wont even interfere.
But one dickhead crashes his car into some people and now anyone who is to the right of AOC is a white supremacist.... and no one dares question it.

When these people decide to make a move... anyone on the wrong side of their ideology is in a lot of trouble.

 

[Cavedweller]

Funny. Discovered by 2 Latvian burglars? Don't tell me they went to the cops.

Can't trust the media: 5 semi-auto ARs, originally reported as "container full of automatic weapons."

Court Reduces Sentence for Far-Left Weapons Hoarding Extremist

A Swedish court has reduced the sentence for far-left extremist Jonas Linde who was convicted for hoarding illegal firearms.

www.breitbart.com

 

[Heywood]

I sat. What the hell let them do what they want. However. We have to watch who we lend support to. A few years back people were talking about how great it was for a new "black" gun club to form without looking at their motives which where clearly socialist/anti government/ anti-American in nature (ironic I know). Anyway I chimed in about the group itself being something normal Americans should not support and some people didn't like what I said. Not too long after, one of their founders was the guy that sniped 5 officers in Dallas. Couldn't find the thread after that happened. Just because a person or group is "pro gun" doesn't mean they deserve support. I view gun ownership as a responsibility to preserve our rights and responsibilities as Americans and can not support a group that wants to "join the club" to undermine.

 

[shibbershabber]

I sat. What the hell let them do what they want. However. We have to watch who we lend support to. A few years back people were talking about how great it was for a new "black" gun club to form without looking at their motives which where clearly socialist/anti government/ anti-American in nature (ironic I know). Anyway I chimed in about the group itself being something normal Americans should not support and some people didn't like what I said. Not too long after, one of their founders was the guy that sniped 5 officers in Dallas. Couldn't find the thread after that happened. Just because a person or group is "pro gun" doesn't mean they deserve support. I view gun ownership as a responsibility to preserve our rights and responsibilities as Americans and can not support a group that wants to "join the club" to undermine.

Ill have to agree with you on that.

There was a time when new gun groups forming was a positive thing... we all thought that the more people got into guns, the more they would support the 2A

Those days are gone.

Groups are forming and arming up for the sole purpose of shutting YOU up... to take YOUR Constitutional rights... to impose Socialism, etc.

Very sketchy times right now. Allies are few and far between.

I dont know which will produce a more violent reaction... a Trump victory in 2020 or his loss...

 

[Cavedweller]

Funny. Discovered by 2 Latvian burglars? Don't tell me they went to the cops.

Court Reduces Sentence for Far-Left Weapons Hoarding Extremist

A Swedish court has reduced the sentence for far-left extremist Jonas Linde who was convicted for hoarding illegal firearms.

www.breitbart.com

Struck me as humorous. The Latvians must have been picked up on an unrelated charge and ratted this guy out as part of a plea deal. That's the only way it makes sense. It's a stretch to think they would turn him in out of a sense of civic duty. Probably a good thing, anyway you look at it.