- Messages
- 68
- Reactions
- 65
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did you not get the link???Link?
More info please
There was no link in your 1st post, just your statement. After I asked, you posted the video, if that's the link you're speaking of. Otherwise there was no linkDid you not get the link???
Ummmm…. isn't all of the recent 2A victories across the country not a sign of being on the offensive?Outstanding - love the 2ndAmendment Foundation. Just wish we could find a way back to going on the offensive.
It's OK to have SOME joy in your life and call even minor progressions a "victory".OK, happy to learn that the court ruled against the defendants' motion to dismiss the lawsuit against the WA mag ban. However, the ruling simply allows the case to move forward, which seems awfully thin to be trumpeted as a "victory". The case still remains to be argued (sometime in the vague future), meaning we're still waiting for the injunctive relief sought by the lawsuit.
Meanwhile, a number of us still feel compelled to cautiously keep our "banned" standard capacity magazines unloaded except at home and while at a firing range. Others among us remain vulnerable to prosecution for (either defiantly or unwittingly) taking reasonable self-defense measures (decreed unlawful by The State of Washington) as we go about our lawful daily activities in public, as well as for engaging in certain (prohibited) acts of commerce that are wholly lawful in most other states.
More like a counterattack to get back lost territory. Regardless of what we call it, they're doing a great job.Ummmm…. isn't all of the recent 2A victories across the country not a sign of being on the offensive?
Apparently I missed something. What magazines are ban? Why would I not be able to keep them loaded in places other than home and a "firing range"? What is legally defined as a firing range?Meanwhile, a number of us still feel compelled to cautiously keep our "banned" standard capacity magazines unloaded except at home and while at a firing range. Others among us remain vulnerable to prosecution for (either defiantly or unwittingly) taking reasonable self-defense measures (decreed unlawful by The State of Washington) as we go about our lawful daily activities in public, as well as for engaging in certain (prohibited) acts of commerce that are wholly lawful in most other states.
The "ban" affects the purchase, sale, or manufacture of magazines after the effective date of said (illegal) legislation. Not the possession and use of magazines owned prior to effective date of said (illegal) legislation.OK, happy to learn that the court ruled against the defendants' motion to dismiss the lawsuit against the WA mag ban. However, the ruling simply allows the case to move forward, which seems awfully thin to be trumpeted as a "victory". The case still remains to be argued (sometime in the vague future), meaning we're still waiting for the injunctive relief sought by the lawsuit.
Meanwhile, a number of us still feel compelled to cautiously keep our "banned" standard capacity magazines unloaded except at home and while at a firing range. Others among us remain vulnerable to prosecution for (either defiantly or unwittingly) taking reasonable self-defense measures (decreed unlawful by The State of Washington) as we go about our lawful daily activities in public, as well as for engaging in certain (prohibited) acts of commerce that are wholly lawful in most other states.
Yup, I sure would call dismissal a defeat, even if temporary, but would you consider that keeping the ruling against dismissal "in perspective" is only a downer for those who have a little trouble with reality? At this point, "Yay!", a fist pump & even a happy "All Right!" is warranted. But stay aware that there is still a lot of road to travel before we "win" an injunction against enforcement.It's OK to have SOME joy in your life and call even minor progressions a "victory".
This is just part of the process. What you want to call it is up to you, but being a killjoy just brings everyone down.
The judge very well could have dismissed. Would you not call that a defeat?
Oops, i must've missed the update about permitting us to actually load standard mags into our EDC and go about our lawful daily business. My mind was still stuck in an earlier interpretation (maybe it was someone's misinterpretation) that we could load 'em at home or load 'em at a firing range, but not elsewhere (whew, I guess I am unwittingly not a felon after all).The "ban" affects the purchase, sale, or manufacture of magazines after the effective date of said (illegal) legislation. Not the possession and use of magazines owned prior to effective date of said (illegal) legislation.
Oops, i must've missed the update about permitting us to actually load standard mags into our EDC and go about our lawful daily business. My mind was still stuck in an earlier interpretation (maybe it was someone's misinterpretation) that we could load 'em at home or load 'em at a firing range, but not elsewhere (whew, I guess I am unwittingly not a felon after all).
There's nothing restricting the use of the magazines or having them loaded. Only transferring/selling "hicap" magazines within the state or importing them. Where did you hear this other stuff?OK, happy to learn that the court ruled against the defendants' motion to dismiss the lawsuit against the WA mag ban. However, the ruling simply allows the case to move forward, which seems awfully thin to be trumpeted as a "victory". The case still remains to be argued (sometime in the vague future), meaning we're still waiting for the injunctive relief sought by the lawsuit.
Meanwhile, a number of us still feel compelled to cautiously keep our "banned" standard capacity magazines unloaded except at home and while at a firing range. Others among us remain vulnerable to prosecution for (either defiantly or unwittingly) taking reasonable self-defense measures (decreed unlawful by The State of Washington) as we go about our lawful daily activities in public, as well as for engaging in certain (prohibited) acts of commerce that are wholly lawful in most other states.