National X-Products Owner James Malarkey Thinks The Magazines He Sells Should Be Restricted By Law

[B5Ben]

WTF is $20,000 million?

 

[B5Ben]

While I may disagree with his points, and would gladly debate them, I'm not childish enough to stop buying his company's products as long as I still can just because he holds a differing opinion to me. That's LITERALLY the problem with the left. If you don't agree, you're out.

Would his ideology have an affect on criminal use of guns? Yeah, if it had been implemented a century ago like the national firearms act of 1935, but not today. The left wants something to make them feel safe now, which is unrealistic, unreasonable, and ill-conceived.

I will continue to buy X Products... products.

I can't help but think that a portion of the profits that he takes home will end up supporting everytown. If you are ok with supporting a business that helps drive the opposition, then ok. Personally, I think there are other companies with products that are the same or very similar, that support causes I align with.

 

[Boboclown]

Odd this gets caught here but not optics planet's decision to not sell magazines over 10 rounds.

 

[Quartermaster]

I can't help but think that a portion of the profits that he takes home will end up supporting everytown. If you are ok with supporting a business that helps drive the opposition, then ok. Personally, I think there are other companies with products that are the same or very similar, that support causes I align with.

Do you have proof to support your claim?

This whole thread was started with the mentality of "I want nothing to do with you since I disagree with you," and that's very antifa type thinking.

I'm 100% okay with being civil while disagreeing with the owner of a firearm company. Until he shuts his doors, he still has employees that support us, and still offers the products that he himself disagrees with.

 

[eightyeight mag]

Odd this gets caught here but not optics planet's decision to not sell magazines over 10 rounds.

Just sent optics planet a message regarding mag limit.
Informed them I will be taking my business elsewhere.
Thanks for the heads up

 

[Member 34319]

Optics planet literally can not sell you regular sized magazines because of the state the operate out of. It has nothing to do about them not wanting to. The school shooting was timed around people noticing this. So folks jumped to the conclusion they pulled their products because of it, when they actually pulled them from a state law.

As for X Products, I'm indifferent. They sell expensive stuff to those that can afford them. The company itself seemed to quickly cut the head off the snake and redact the owners sentiment and in hopes clear themselves from his feelings and opinions. Hard to say if the hit has done its damage or not.

Personally I'm ok with boycotting a company for being anti our cause. Honestly it makes zero sense to continue supporting any company that states they are against the continuation of the level of firearm ownership currently allowed. Think the boiled frog. Each time a company lets us down just a little we move our point in the scale, each time the water gets a little hotter. I'm against this, and I'll use my hard earned money to let them know I disagree 1st, and 2nd my other protected right to tell others about their disdain for our other protected rights.

 

[Boboclown]

Optics planet literally can not sell you regular sized magazines because of the state the operate out of. It has nothing to do about them not wanting to. The school shooting was timed around people noticing this. So folks jumped to the conclusion they pulled their products because of it, when they actually pulled them from a state law.

Illinois, the state, does not have a magazine capacity law. Cook County, the county they are in, does. HOWEVER, the city they're in does not. However, the city they are in does not have a law against the magazines. In Illinois, city law takes over instead of county. They follow city law, not county.

 

[Member 34319]

Illinois, the state, does not have a magazine capacity law. Cook County, the county they are in, does. HOWEVER, the city they're in does not. However, the city they are in does not have a law against the magazines. In Illinois, city law takes over instead of county. They follow city law, not county.

That makes my brain hurt.

 

[Boboclown]

That makes my brain hurt.

Basically, the city they are in does not have a law against magazines. Because of that, they are legally able to not only have the magazines, they are able to sell them.

Not every location in Illinois is Chicago you know.

 

[B5Ben]

Do you have proof to support your claim?

This whole thread was started with the mentality of "I want nothing to do with you since I disagree with you," and that's very antifa type thinking.

I'm 100% okay with being civil while disagreeing with the owner of a firearm company. Until he shuts his doors, he still has employees that support us, and still offers the products that he himself disagrees with.

My "claim" is based upon the fact that his wife is a fund raiser for everytown. Its in the link. Just a little deductive logic determines that its a high probability. My wife has a big heart for neglected and abused animals. We donate to no kill animal shelters and a host of other animal rescue type organizations through out the year. His wife is clearly an Everytown supporter. I'm sure they donate to causes that are aligned with their beliefs, and they have a right to. I choose not spend money with companies (or companies that have CEO's) that do not align with my beliefs.

 

[billdeserthills]

While I may disagree with his points, and would gladly debate them, I'm not childish enough to stop buying his company's products as long as I still can just because he holds a differing opinion to me. That's LITERALLY the problem with the left. If you don't agree, you're out.

Would his ideology have an affect on criminal use of guns? Yeah, if it had been implemented a century ago like the national firearms act of 1935, but not today. The left wants something to make them feel safe now, which is unrealistic, unreasonable, and ill-conceived.

I will continue to buy X Products... products.

If I buy any of his products it will be used, just to be sure he doen't make any additional profit

 

[Member 34319]

Basically, the city they are in does not have a law against magazines. Because of that, they are legally able to not only have the magazines, they are able to sell them.

Not every location in Illinois is Chicago you know.

Well that sucks two ways.

So they lied about why they aren't selling them on top of not selling them. That isn't going to end well.

 

[DuneHopper]

I see it as hey its their choice its a private company, and we can pick and choose whom we buy from welcome to America.
Honestly I see no practical reason for drum mags, other then to mag dump, spray pray at a target for bubblegums and giggles. But practical wise its makes the rifle insanely heavy, you need hicaps just in hopes you will hit something with that 50rd. 75 100 rd drum. Its also the same with bump stock, I could build one in a fee hours I had one a couple years ago for fun and its was a waste so why they man bans them I could care less from a user stand point. Rights are a different discussion.

 

[Caveman Jim]

I couldn't believe seeing that on TV the other night. Shame I bought my AR-9 from him just a few months ago.

BUT, I'm far more outraged about the CNN puppet-fest that they put on, exploiting the tragedy and feeding students very divisive questions. At least Dana Loesch did a credible job standing up to the harsh questions. Wish Marco Rubio would have stood his ground and not caved when confronted about magazine capacity. This isn't looking good...

Edit: Wow. Just read this: NRA's Dana Loesch Claims CNN Town Hall Attendees Rushed Stage Screaming "Burn Her"

That Sheriff bold faced lied, he let the froot loop go free after 39 reports at the home he lived!!! He didn't take the guns out of that crazy basstards hands like he was praising!!!
He also should be brought up on charges along with those in the FBI who dropped the ball, head should roll!!!!

 

[Mike Johnson]

just bought some 40 rd pmags for my AR today , yummers

 

[LowPriceGuns]

Jason Cazes here, Owner Lowpriceguns.com

Everything in my store in Bellevue, Guns, Ammo, optics, EVERYTHING is at cost / no markup through March 23rd. Check out below what I'm doing.....


My specific goal to get this done is to do a constitutional amendment which includes:

1. Handgun and Longgun purchases and transfers will have a minimum age of 21, with Active Military, Honorably Discharged, or sworn law enforcement having exemptions at age 18. Current laws applying to Handguns will remain in effect, which would be applying to a parent buying a long gun for their child to possess and use. Parent's are assuming responsibility. (This is currently legal for handguns)

2. FBI and State Background checks put into one system, which has to be created and maintained by a joint effort between the Federal Government, and all of the states, taking current systems and combining them, improving them, that checks felonies, domestic violence, mental illness, and dishonorable military discharges all in one place with one check.

3. Create a National Database for stolen gun serial numbers to be entered by law enforcement, which FFL dealers can access via the web, to enter serials of guns they purchase from individuals, to check if they are stolen so they can report seller. (This doesn't exist)

4. Require the new 'Universal Background FBI and State check system' be done at FFL dealer with form 4473 for all Private transfers between individuals.

5. To not store private citizens 'checked' information in system, such as personal info, or makes models of guns purchased, so no 'National Registry' is built and maintained, to keep law abiding citizens info and ownership private from the government.

6. All Handguns and Long guns sold legally today, including ARs, and Hi-Capacity Magazines are prohibited from bans by states in the future. The individual has the right to use all current legal firearms sold today as their choice as a defensive rifle, with all legal capacities available today to defend themselves personally.

7. No Gun Free Zones. Except inside locations serving alcohol. (98.4% Mass shootings since 2016 occurred in Gun Free Zones - (They are an open Invitation for coward criminals)

8. Universal Concealed Carry Check for all states. Linking to new 'Universal Federal and State System', giving law-abiding citizens the right to protect themselves and others anywhere.

9. Attempted legal purchases or transfers that result in a 'Denial', will be followed up on by the FBI within 5 business days. If the attempt was done by a felon, prosecution charges will be brought against the individual. If the person is unable to buy the gun legally, and get's another person to legally purchase for them, which is called a 'straw purchase', the straw purchaser will be subject to the same prosecution as the criminal they are buying for. (Nothing is currently being done to prosecute, follow up on denied individuals, or straw purchasers.)

Can 2/3 of Congress agree and get this done? You decide. You ask for it.

This will start blasting on AM570 tomorrow throughout the next few weeks just about every hour.

Message to both sides: We have to work together to get a solution.

Do you, left and right, want to keep fighting and solve nothing?

To react like teenagers in a circle of childish hate?

Both sides would have to agree to accomplish the goal I am suggesting.

If both goals for both sides are obtainable together, are you in? Ok. Can you think Big?

Otherwise, neither side wins. Together we win.

Do you want to remain a part of the problem or part of the solution?

The choice is yours....which will be the majority's choice on both sides collectively.

It's in your hands, within reach right now. I'm just leading the way.

 

[fredball]

Typical Snow flake
I had never heard of x-products, but I won't buy from them either
It would be anti American as I see it what a Dick

 

[Mike Johnson]

why are military exempt at 18 , just because you are in or were in the military does not make you better at handling guns.

 

[Mike Johnson]

hey look another FFL that wants everything done at his store, imagine that, cha ching

 

[Quartermaster]

Obvious troll is obvious