- Messages
- 4,167
- Reactions
- 19,366
Ya, I'm disappointed…
… a much better sarcastic name would have been
"MidwokeUSA".
… a much better sarcastic name would have been
"MidwokeUSA".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This exchange reminds me of this video, specifically the prosecutor:Fine. You're in Oregon, would you let your guest shot up heroin in your home via needle.
Yeah. I give up. You sign the back of the check.This exchange reminds me of this video, specifically the prosecutor:
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=b_zwTfTNK2E&pp=ygUga3lsZSByaXR0ZW5ob3VzZSBwcm9zZWN1dG9yIGZhaWw%3D
Watch between 1:00-3:00, it is a master-class in the art of conflation.
This exchange reminds me of this video, specifically the prosecutor:
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=b_zwTfTNK2E&pp=ygUga3lsZSByaXR0ZW5ob3VzZSBwcm9zZWN1dG9yIGZhaWw%3D
Watch between 1:00-3:00, it is a master-class in the art of conflation.
I didn't realize I have to answer everyone's questions. Sorry it must be a blow to your ego/power trip. I see no reason to answer rhetorical questions when their purpose is just to continue what is already a circular discussion.
Won't ever answer a direct question, won't ever shut up, have you been here before?
This logic is top tierYeah. I give up. You sign the back of the check.
LOL, you're like the ChatGPT only not as reliable.I didn't realize I have to answer everyone's questions. Sorry it must be a blow to your ego/power trip. I see no reason to answer rhetorical questions when their purpose is just to continue what is already a circular discussion.
Furthermore, an answer to those ridiculous analogies will do nothing to validate their use as an argument in support of MidwayUSA.
Let me try though:
Would you allow someone to smoke weed or shoot up heroin in your home?
If you answer, no, is it just because of legal liability, or are there other factors at play?
Is Midway refusing to sell magazines (even though it's legal) to Oregonians even remotely similar to a homeowner not allowing someone to use drugs on their property?
Have I not already stated multiple times that I understand the perceived liability that
MidwayUSA is afraid of?
If the liability and risk is as obvious and extreme as people are making it out to be, wouldn't you agree that way more companies would be following Midway's approach? Why then are they in the minority?
Direct answers only please!
Great stuff! This coming from the guy who accused me of liking personal attacks.LOL, you're like the ChatGPT only not as reliable.
I love how you think I'm still reading this shet. What the hell is that up there anyway? It's not a stick...Great stuff! This coming from the guy who accused me of liking personal attacks.
Btw I couldn't find the direct answers to my questions in your reply. That's weird considering how much it seems to mean to you.
It seems you can't fathom business risk since you don't own a business. You aren't responsible for the livelihood of other people that work for said business or the stakeholders. AKA you sign the back of the check.This logic is top tier
Well it makes more sense now, you've been replying to my messages but just haven't actually read their content!I love how you think I'm still reading this shet. What the hell is that up there anyway? It's not a stick...
View attachment 1819392
I don't know. Are you sure that's going to be Woke enough for you?Well it makes more sense now, you've been replying to my messages but just haven't actually read their content!
We probably actually agree on everything! I'm glad we can move on now
It seems you can't fathom how we've hashed this out ad nauseum. It seems you can't fathom that I've already stated that I understand Midway's perspective completely (this being probably the 10th time).It seems you can't fathom business risk since you don't own a business. You aren't responsible for the livelihood of other people that work for said business or the stakeholders. AKA you sign the back of the check.
This sums up this thread perfectly lol
Really struck a nerve, eh?It seems you can't fathom how we've hashed this out ad nauseum. It seems you can't fathom that I've already stated that I understand Midway's perspective completely (this being probably the 10th time).
What you really can't fathom is that I won't say, "Yes, I agree with you, Midway is being reasonable and it makes no sense to boycott them."
I am not going to say that because that is where I disagree. There is too much evidence to the contrary that shows Midway is just taking the easy way out. There are too many other companies out there (ones which are just as responsible for the livelihoods of their employees) who don't seem to agree with Midway. Furthermore, there are no case studies in support of the perceived liability that is at the core of this issue.
"You sound vaccinated"I don't know. Are you sure that's going to be Woke enough for you?
Have you done anything right today?"You sound vaccinated"
Did I do that right?
Boycott away. I don't think they're going to miss your $100 in lost profits.It seems you can't fathom how we've hashed this out ad nauseum. It seems you can't fathom that I've already stated that I understand Midway's perspective completely (this being probably the 10th time).
What you really can't fathom is that I won't say, "Yes, I agree with you, Midway is being reasonable and it makes no sense to boycott them."
I am not going to say that because that is where I disagree. There is too much evidence to the contrary that shows Midway is just taking the easy way out. There are too many other companies out there (ones which are just as responsible for the livelihoods of their employees) who don't seem to agree with Midway. Furthermore, there are no case studies in support of the perceived liability that is at the core of this issue.