WokewayUSA? This is so disappointing

[albin25]

Ya, I'm disappointed…
… a much better sarcastic name would have been
"MidwokeUSA".

 

[mhayd93]

Fine. You're in Oregon, would you let your guest shot up heroin in your home via needle.

This exchange reminds me of this video, specifically the prosecutor:

View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=b_zwTfTNK2E&pp=ygUga3lsZSByaXR0ZW5ob3VzZSBwcm9zZWN1dG9yIGZhaWw%3D


Watch between 1:00-3:00, it is a master-class in the art of conflation.

 

[solv3nt]

This exchange reminds me of this video, specifically the prosecutor:

View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=b_zwTfTNK2E&pp=ygUga3lsZSByaXR0ZW5ob3VzZSBwcm9zZWN1dG9yIGZhaWw%3D


Watch between 1:00-3:00, it is a master-class in the art of conflation.

Yeah. I give up. You sign the back of the check.

 

[Flopsweat]

This exchange reminds me of this video, specifically the prosecutor:

View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=b_zwTfTNK2E&pp=ygUga3lsZSByaXR0ZW5ob3VzZSBwcm9zZWN1dG9yIGZhaWw%3D


Watch between 1:00-3:00, it is a master-class in the art of conflation.

Won't ever answer a direct question, won't ever shut up, have you been here before?

 

[mhayd93]

Won't ever answer a direct question, won't ever shut up, have you been here before?

I didn't realize I have to answer everyone's questions. Sorry it must be a blow to your ego/power trip. I see no reason to answer rhetorical questions when their purpose is just to continue what is already a circular discussion.

Furthermore, an answer to those ridiculous analogies will do nothing to validate their use as an argument in support of MidwayUSA.

Let me try though:
Would you allow someone to smoke weed or shoot up heroin in your home?

If you answer, no, is it just because of legal liability, or are there other factors at play?

Is Midway refusing to sell magazines (even though it's legal) to Oregonians even remotely similar to a homeowner not allowing someone to use drugs on their property?

Have I not already stated multiple times that I understand the perceived liability that
MidwayUSA is afraid of?

If the liability and risk is as obvious and extreme as people are making it out to be, wouldn't you agree that way more companies would be following Midway's approach? Why then are they in the minority?

Direct answers only please!

 

[mhayd93]

Yeah. I give up. You sign the back of the check.

This logic is top tier

 

[Flopsweat]

I didn't realize I have to answer everyone's questions. Sorry it must be a blow to your ego/power trip. I see no reason to answer rhetorical questions when their purpose is just to continue what is already a circular discussion.

Furthermore, an answer to those ridiculous analogies will do nothing to validate their use as an argument in support of MidwayUSA.

Let me try though:
Would you allow someone to smoke weed or shoot up heroin in your home?

If you answer, no, is it just because of legal liability, or are there other factors at play?

Is Midway refusing to sell magazines (even though it's legal) to Oregonians even remotely similar to a homeowner not allowing someone to use drugs on their property?

Have I not already stated multiple times that I understand the perceived liability that
MidwayUSA is afraid of?

If the liability and risk is as obvious and extreme as people are making it out to be, wouldn't you agree that way more companies would be following Midway's approach? Why then are they in the minority?

Direct answers only please!

LOL, you're like the ChatGPT only not as reliable.

 

[GrayGoose]

Coconut oil is my favorite for making popcorn.

 

[mhayd93]

LOL, you're like the ChatGPT only not as reliable.

Great stuff! This coming from the guy who accused me of liking personal attacks.

Btw I couldn't find the direct answers to my questions in your reply. That's weird considering how much it seems to mean to you.

 

[Flopsweat]

Great stuff! This coming from the guy who accused me of liking personal attacks.

Btw I couldn't find the direct answers to my questions in your reply. That's weird considering how much it seems to mean to you.

I love how you think I'm still reading this shet. What the hell is that up there anyway? It's not a stick...

 

[solv3nt]

This logic is top tier

It seems you can't fathom business risk since you don't own a business. You aren't responsible for the livelihood of other people that work for said business or the stakeholders. AKA you sign the back of the check.

 

[mhayd93]

I love how you think I'm still reading this shet. What the hell is that up there anyway? It's not a stick...

View attachment 1819392

Well it makes more sense now, you've been replying to my messages but just haven't actually read their content!

We probably actually agree on everything! I'm glad we can move on now

 

[Flopsweat]

Well it makes more sense now, you've been replying to my messages but just haven't actually read their content!

We probably actually agree on everything! I'm glad we can move on now

I don't know. Are you sure that's going to be Woke enough for you?

 

[TTSX]

View: https://youtu.be/ki_R_4FcFK0?feature=shared

 

[mhayd93]

It seems you can't fathom business risk since you don't own a business. You aren't responsible for the livelihood of other people that work for said business or the stakeholders. AKA you sign the back of the check.

It seems you can't fathom how we've hashed this out ad nauseum. It seems you can't fathom that I've already stated that I understand Midway's perspective completely (this being probably the 10th time).

What you really can't fathom is that I won't say, "Yes, I agree with you, Midway is being reasonable and it makes no sense to boycott them."

I am not going to say that because that is where I disagree. There is too much evidence to the contrary that shows Midway is just taking the easy way out. There are too many other companies out there (ones which are just as responsible for the livelihoods of their employees) who don't seem to agree with Midway. Furthermore, there are no case studies in support of the perceived liability that is at the core of this issue.

 

[mhayd93]

View: https://youtu.be/ki_R_4FcFK0?feature=shared

This sums up this thread perfectly lol

 

[Flopsweat]

It seems you can't fathom how we've hashed this out ad nauseum. It seems you can't fathom that I've already stated that I understand Midway's perspective completely (this being probably the 10th time).

What you really can't fathom is that I won't say, "Yes, I agree with you, Midway is being reasonable and it makes no sense to boycott them."

I am not going to say that because that is where I disagree. There is too much evidence to the contrary that shows Midway is just taking the easy way out. There are too many other companies out there (ones which are just as responsible for the livelihoods of their employees) who don't seem to agree with Midway. Furthermore, there are no case studies in support of the perceived liability that is at the core of this issue.

Really struck a nerve, eh?

 

[mhayd93]

I don't know. Are you sure that's going to be Woke enough for you?

"You sound vaccinated"

Did I do that right?

 

[Flopsweat]

"You sound vaccinated"

Did I do that right?

Have you done anything right today?

 

[solv3nt]

It seems you can't fathom how we've hashed this out ad nauseum. It seems you can't fathom that I've already stated that I understand Midway's perspective completely (this being probably the 10th time).

What you really can't fathom is that I won't say, "Yes, I agree with you, Midway is being reasonable and it makes no sense to boycott them."

I am not going to say that because that is where I disagree. There is too much evidence to the contrary that shows Midway is just taking the easy way out. There are too many other companies out there (ones which are just as responsible for the livelihoods of their employees) who don't seem to agree with Midway. Furthermore, there are no case studies in support of the perceived liability that is at the core of this issue.

Boycott away. I don't think they're going to miss your $100 in lost profits.