Gold Supporter
Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 12,992
- Reactions
- 47,396
^^^So much this. I subject my guns to enough "abuse" through regular use, submerging them mud and running them over with a truck is not going to tell me anything I don't already know. Youtube torture tests are lame.
Agreed.
The reason I posted those videos is not as a suggestion that you should cover them in mud or even that one is better than the other. It's about perceptions, one of which is that an AR is fragile. The second is that the AK is some sort of weapon designed by Klingons and is unstoppable as well as unbreakable. That, and the 7.62x39 can sink a battleship and still put a hole in the carrier behind it. None of which is true.
All firearms have design trade offs and none of them are perfect. My point was that we need to see them for the machines they are and not so much for what we think they are.
In my case I standardized on a platform so that others in my family who are not "gun people" would have an easier learning curve if the fit hit the shan. The AK was on the list and if it were just me might have fit the bill. I chose the AR for ergonomics, the ability to perform routine maintenance and even major repairs, weight and a whole other slew of factors. I do not regret that decision, but I still respect the hell out of the other common platforms,
Now please excuse me - my cat just walked by my AR and slightly brushed against it, so now I need to put it back together again. Anybody seen my armorer's wrench?
Last Edited: