- Messages
- 1,166
- Reactions
- 1,090
I don't know why you're being so combative with this. I was originally making a joke. I think you're missing the point. You don't need to be able to read and write to think critically. That was the joke.I'm just wondering how these lines get drawn. Given that whatever was spoken in Britain in the 5th century would probably be unintelligible to a modern English speaker, who is to say it's the same language?
So, how did that happen? Did they have a meeting and decide on new rules, like with Esperanto?
You say that like it's supposed to be some kind of revelation.