Washington (New name TAXINGTON) has been an assault on Constitutional issues for years. Ban Assault Politicians!)The 10/22 has been considered an assault weapon in Washington for some time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Washington (New name TAXINGTON) has been an assault on Constitutional issues for years. Ban Assault Politicians!)The 10/22 has been considered an assault weapon in Washington for some time.
A term from the '60's...CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE...has been mentioned recently.Don't know, increasingly don't care. Can't describe the situation any different than what an enemy would seek to do, and why would I follow the path an enemy had pushed me to go.
Clearly they don't care about the constitution, and only their agenda. They'd just as soon sick the police on me with the same guns they claim aren't fit for civilian ownership, while they sit in buildings guarded by guns.
Better it boil over already than continue down the path of slow, but perpetual decay.
Sad thing is, most of them already do eat dicks and they enjoy it.
I'm sure the chocolate tastes better though….. I have no experience in that area. Haha.Sad thing is, most of them already do eat dicks and they enjoy it.
I think there's a route here, optimistically, where they aren't denied, Because you already have a "SBR" here and it's not following the "normal" Form1 process where it's approved before creation. Of course, that means the ATF would have to do the right thing... which has low likelihood of happening.It will result in any WA resident with a pending Form 1 for their braced pistol being denied tax stamp.
You are reading it wrong.I don't see that at all in my reading of it. I think they aren't regulating each individual part. You can buy a flash suppressor for example. That is the same category as suppressor to them.
I read that as if a person bought a complete kit (or a combination of parts that makes a complete kit) to build a banned weapon that woudl be a violation.
By reading it as any "part", then any part at all that could be used to make an "assault rifle" would be illegal. A part by itself does not constitute an "assault rifle".
Now if you had all the parts together in a box? Then I think they are saying that would be an "assault rifle". That's how I read it anyway.
If that's the case, road trip to Idaho or have family and friends who live in a free state mail them to you. I don't think that Washington will resort to scanning / x-raying every single package that comes into the state.From what I read, it sounds like they won't allow you to buy rifle parts anymore either?
Or it would have already happened.when will enough be enough? NEVER when it hits the federal level pr we just gonna bend over then too? YES when will Americans act NEVER versus talk crap about law makers on the internet?
Yes. Constructive possession is it. When the prosecutor throws the book at someone, these rules+laws gives more things that might stick, but "parts" (pistol grips, muzzle device, barrel shroud) will still be legal to buy and own IMO....
Similar to what the alphabet is doing with braces. "Technically" legal to buy and own, but if there is any demonstrable intent to use it to make what they now want to call an SBR.... they "could" try and jam you up for constructive possession.
....
As I read it, the star does the check and after the governor signs it they want to be able to run a check if it meets the requirements of their infringing billI think there's a route here, optimistically, where they aren't denied, Because you already have a "SBR" here and it's not following the "normal" Form1 process where it's approved before creation. Of course, that means the ATF would have to do the right thing... which has low likelihood of happening.
WA Gun Law guy agrees....interesting.I think there's a route here, optimistically, where they aren't denied, Because you already have a "SBR" here and it's not following the "normal" Form1 process where it's approved before creation. Of course, that means the ATF would have to do the right thing... which has low likelihood of happening.
Problem is, that YOU don't know what a BAR MkII is. It doesn't accept a detachable magazine. And the proposed law is about hand gaurd that completely surround all or part of the barrel, to protect the hand from heat. The BAR MKII has a wooden fore stock attached to the bottom of the barrel, specifically mentioned in the proposed law as the only legal stock.The problem is that your rifle is. It is semi auto, accepts a detachable magazine and had a hand guard that protects part of all of the barrel.
Yeah, vote harder next tume buddy, let us know how that works out...How about if we invest in actual leaders who follow the constitution instead of communist!
Hey, don't do that.Yeah, vote harder next tume buddy, let us know how that works out...