National Victory for Gun Owners: Frames and Receivers Are NOT Firearms!

[hongkong2]

Victory for Gun Owners: Frames and Receivers Are NOT Firearms! - The New American

Though this court victory over the ATF is encouraging, the agency remains a significant threat to gun and gun-shop owners. ...

thenewamerican.com

Read More

 

[CamoDeafie]

National - Court Strikes Down ATF Frame/Receiver Rule

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/court-strikes-down-atfs-frame-or-receiver-rule?mc_cid=a3957226ba&mc_eid=88d7753084

www.northwestfirearms.com

Dupe?

 

[ma96782]

Good news.

BUT, But, but.......it'll take a lot more, before some of the individual states, will recognize the premise. And, LOL......even then, I predict that some will TRY and TRY AGAIN. Because Yeah......it wasn't clear enough (so they claim).....

"........shall not be infringed."

Aloha, Mark

 

[fmvolume86]

doesnt that make it so "if not fire arms" they can regulate them how they want ????? a correct answer would have been AMERICANS HAVE A RIGHT TO BUILD THEIR OWN FIREARM and we've never had a need to serialize unless you were manufacturing (selling them)

 

[RX-79G]

This seems to be about 80% receivers. How does this ruling make a serialized receiver not a firearm?

 

[Diamondback]

Now if we can just figure out how to beat that through the thick, crap-filled skulls in Olympia and Salem...

 

[JustShoot]

Now if we can just figure out how to beat that through the thick, crap-filled skulls in Olympia and Salem...

I prefer a nice 16oz. Estwing

-

-

 

[NinjaTard]

This was a ruling in Texas, so correct me if I am wrong, but this doesn't mean anything to us Oregon folk who just had Madame Kotex give us a year to serialize our spooky blasters or become misdemeanors?

It may lead to another ruling that applies in Supreme Court or perhaps here in Oregon but for now we're still no longer allowed to have "ghost guns", right?

 

[kmk1012]

This was a ruling in Texas, so correct me if I am wrong, but this doesn't mean anything to us Oregon folk who just had Madame Kotex give us a year to serialize our spooky blasters or become misdemeanors?

It may lead to another ruling that applies in Supreme Court or perhaps here in Oregon but for now we're still no longer allowed to have "ghost guns", right?

Misdemeanors? I thought it was felony

 

[DunRanull]

Good news.

BUT, But, but.......it'll take a lot more, before some of the individual states, will recognize the premise. And, LOL......even then, I predict that some will TRY and TRY AGAIN. Because Yeah......it wasn't clear enough (so they claim).....

"........shall not be infringed."

Aloha, Mark

What "INFRINGED"? WE'RE Talkin Common sense regulations, right?
HAH! MOTHER can I trust the government? Mother, should I build the wall? Mother do you think they'll try to break my balls?

 

[NinjaTard]

Misdemeanors? I thought it was felony

It's a misdemeanor for first two offenses then it's a felony after. That's how I'm reading it but I could be wrong.

 

[bionic knees]

as usual, things are clear as mud. what I saw yesterday said it would be illegal to sell a ghost gun. so who knows what is really going on

 

[ToyCruiser]

So, hurry up and finish those 80s before September boys and girls.

 

[PiratePast40]

Not so fast. Seems the judge issued a one week temporary stay. Here's the statement from FPC, and here's a Youtube video:

 

[Cavedweller]

Now if we can just figure out how to beat that through the thick, crap-filled skulls in Olympia and Salem...

You will never convince the True Believers. They must simply be defeated.

 

[RX-79G]

You will never convince the True Believers. They must simply be defeated.

Defeated by what? Charlton Heston quotes?