- Messages
- 18
- Reactions
- 10
Hey, folks.
I am taking my 30-06 chambered Remington 721 (1960s, I think, but haven't looked it up) out for deer next week with my friend who was in the marine corps. He's bigger than I am and says that the rifle is no fun to shoot as is, and I 100% agree. I've been looking over recoil pads to install, and I have 2 questions.
1) The stock has an aluminum plate on it. The plate alone measures about 6.125 x 1.625 inches in the largest parts. The stock is a little bit thicker and wider. The largest recoil pad I've seen is only 5.75 inches long. What gives? Does this old 721 have a freakishly large end to its stock, or am I missing something about how the pads/stock are measured?
2) I don't entirely understand length of pull (LOP), but I don't think I would mind adding an inch or so of length to the stock. As far as I can see, the stock hasn't been shortened. I see a lot of people cut their stock a bit shorter to maintain the same length of pull. I have not shot that many long guns (maybe 8 or 10), but I have never really felt like any of them put the trigger too far from my shoulder. Is this really a big deal? If I were to shorten the stock (I wouldn't on this rifle because the stock is pretty nice and has some hand-done decoration), I suppose it would make the end a little smaller top to bottom, but I would have to remove almost half of the stock to get it down to 5.7 inches.
I am taking my 30-06 chambered Remington 721 (1960s, I think, but haven't looked it up) out for deer next week with my friend who was in the marine corps. He's bigger than I am and says that the rifle is no fun to shoot as is, and I 100% agree. I've been looking over recoil pads to install, and I have 2 questions.
1) The stock has an aluminum plate on it. The plate alone measures about 6.125 x 1.625 inches in the largest parts. The stock is a little bit thicker and wider. The largest recoil pad I've seen is only 5.75 inches long. What gives? Does this old 721 have a freakishly large end to its stock, or am I missing something about how the pads/stock are measured?
2) I don't entirely understand length of pull (LOP), but I don't think I would mind adding an inch or so of length to the stock. As far as I can see, the stock hasn't been shortened. I see a lot of people cut their stock a bit shorter to maintain the same length of pull. I have not shot that many long guns (maybe 8 or 10), but I have never really felt like any of them put the trigger too far from my shoulder. Is this really a big deal? If I were to shorten the stock (I wouldn't on this rifle because the stock is pretty nice and has some hand-done decoration), I suppose it would make the end a little smaller top to bottom, but I would have to remove almost half of the stock to get it down to 5.7 inches.