Registration & Confiscation

[zeezee]

General Assembly


Proposed Bill No. 5800


January Session, 2011


LCO No. 1944


Referred to Committee on Public Safety and Security


Introduced by:


REP. WALKER, 93rd Dist.

SEN. HARP, 10th Dist.

REP. HOLDER-WINFIELD, 94th Dist.


AN ACT REQUIRING REGISTRATION OF ALL FIREARMS.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:

That section 29-33 of the general statutes be amended to (1) require that (A) any person who purchases a firearm register the firearm within ten days of purchase, (B) any person who purchased a firearm prior to this statute's effective date register that firearm within ten days of the effective date, (C) any person owning a firearm renew registration every five years, and (D) anyone whose registered firearm is sold, stolen or lost report such sale, theft or loss within ten days of such event; and (2) provide that the Department of Public Safety receive the registrations required by subdivision (1) of this section.

Statement of Purpose:

To require registration of all firearms.

AN ACT REQUIRING REGISTRATION OF ALL FIREARMS.

Read More

 

[Riot]

They want them registered so they can take them away!

 

[Redcap]

Not gonna happen.

 

[Mason3379]

Not gonna happen.

I bet that is what they said in Australia, England, and Canada too!

 

[Trlsmn]

State of Connecticut

 

[supergenius]

HAHAHAHA wont happen.

 

[PBinWA]

CT is right next to NY and NJ. I wouldn't be surprised if it did happen.

 

[Redcap]

I bet that is what they said in Australia, England, and Canada too!

I highly doubt that.

 

[billdeserthills]

I betcha the NRA won't even hafta spend a dime fighting this one, it is total BS

 

[raftman]

I betcha the NRA won't even hafta spend a dime fighting this one, it is total BS

True, but the anti-gun crowd may be using a clever tactic here. They might be proposing an extreme gun control measure, one that they know the public cannot stomach, or order to make a "less extreme" gun control measure seem relatively acceptable and reasonable. That is, it could be an attempt at creating a false dichotomy in which they will say it's either this gun control measure or that gun control measure, and they don't really lose the battle regardless of what people choose as long as people are distracted from the fact that they can say "none of the above."

 

[jgeist]

General Assembly


Proposed Bill No. 5800


January Session, 2011


LCO No. 1944


Referred to Committee on Public Safety and Security


Introduced by:


REP. WALKER, 93rd Dist.

SEN. HARP, 10th Dist.

REP. HOLDER-WINFIELD, 94th Dist.


AN ACT REQUIRING REGISTRATION OF ALL FIREARMS.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:

That section 29-33 of the general statutes be amended to (1) require that (A) any person who purchases a firearm register the firearm within ten days of purchase, (B) any person who purchased a firearm prior to this statute's effective date register that firearm within ten days of the effective date, (C) any person owning a firearm renew registration every five years, and (D) anyone whose registered firearm is sold, stolen or lost report such sale, theft or loss within ten days of such event; and (2) provide that the Department of Public Safety receive the registrations required by subdivision (1) of this section.

Statement of Purpose:

To require registration of all firearms.

AN ACT REQUIRING REGISTRATION OF ALL FIREARMS.

That is absolute POOP (edited for content, as to not offend)... If SHTF, they just want to know where to go first to disarm the public...

 

[jgeist]

Wow, so you don't like the message and that leads to more deleting.... 1st Amendment is living strong on the 2nd Amendment thread and site...

 

[billdeserthills]

True, but the anti-gun crowd may be using a clever tactic here. They might be proposing an extreme gun control measure, one that they know the public cannot stomach, or order to make a "less extreme" gun control measure seem relatively acceptable and reasonable. That is, it could be an attempt at creating a false dichotomy in which they will say it's either this gun control measure or that gun control measure, and they don't really lose the battle regardless of what people choose as long as people are distracted from the fact that they can say "none of the above."

Those poofters don't have enough Republican votes