I'm making this thread so maybe someone with more insight on the matter can enlighten me as to how the "Universal Background Check" bills that they are proposing at a national level would effectively compared to laws such we have in Oregon. As all Oregonians are aware, there is no gunshow loophole here. I can't sell or buy from someone in a parking lot legally and as far as I'm aware I can't transfer a firearm to a family member without using an FFL either. So...
I'm curious what ramifications a UBGC would have on States such as Oregon where we already have such laws. Not looking for official legal advice but I'm also not looking for opinions that don't have some basis in legality.
Most of the pro-gun arguments I've heard against UBGCs involve a gun registry being created. I'm curious if this differs from what we have in Oregon or even Washington and to what degree.
I'm curious what ramifications a UBGC would have on States such as Oregon where we already have such laws. Not looking for official legal advice but I'm also not looking for opinions that don't have some basis in legality.
Most of the pro-gun arguments I've heard against UBGCs involve a gun registry being created. I'm curious if this differs from what we have in Oregon or even Washington and to what degree.
Last Edited: