Silver Lifetime
- Messages
- 42,997
- Reactions
- 111,734
That is next - one step at a timeI hope they don't want to modernize sales of reloading components.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is next - one step at a timeI hope they don't want to modernize sales of reloading components.
More info pleaseWA will throw down on california style ammo restrictions in 2024. The Constitution means nothing to them.
We aren't "supposed to shoot". Period. Cut, slash, bludgeon, explode, set afire, punch, crush, hang, push off high places, hold down under water, yes. But shoot? That's uncivilized and only for warfare or government!Let me guess, they don't think ammo is covered under 2A... we're supposed to shoot blanks, yeah?
Especially when they want to shoot us...We aren't "supposed to shoot". Period. Cut, slash, bludgeon, explode, set afire, punch, crush, hang, push off high places, hold down under water, yes. But shoot? That's uncivilized and only for warfare or government!
The best way to hunt.... wait for an elk to show up, then follow him to the edge of a cliff. Push off edge of cliff. Meal is waiting at bottom of cliff. If other predators try to move in on the carcass, punch them and set them on fire.We aren't "supposed to shoot". Period. Cut, slash, bludgeon, explode, set afire, punch, crush, hang, push off high places, hold down under water, yes. But shoot? That's uncivilized and only for warfare or government!
You mean 'ghost bullits'I hope they don't want to modernize sales of reloading components.
Piker, I'm not gonna be happy until I have my own private prepper-TRAIN.I always thought "bulk ammo" was anything greater than a tractor trailer full. Since I don't buy more than that at a time, I'll approve it.
It would be interesting to see the investing activities of the three schmucks as they introduced the bill.This should help spur ammo sales.
California is doing it now and Illinois has been doing it with the FOID card for decades. I believe Canada did it for awhile but found the administrative load too mech with little return.Wasn't this tried under the Gun Control Act of 1968 and then dropped because of the administrative/paperwork nightmare background checks would be on ammo?
How is it we have legislators writing legislation that's been tried and failed before? Do they have no capacity to research the annals of federal laws?
This is more proof that legislators should be a part-time job. They've got nothing better to do with their time than created legislation that repeats tried and failed attempts from the past.
Solomon was correct, there's nothing new under the sun.
Happy Sunday Team Second Amendment!
Understood, both (CA and IL) of which I feel are unconstitutional. Seems to me legislators never want to strike at the root of the problem which is "criminal misuse" of the product or products. We need a new breed of legislators.California is doing it now and Illinois has been doing it with the FOID card for decades. I believe Canada did it for awhile but found the administrative load too mech with little return.
In any case, they really don't care about any consequences as long as they "do something" to solidify the votes of the anti-gunners. Makes no difference if it has any effect or not.
Because criminals keep legislators employed.Understood, both (CA and IL) of which I feel are unconstitutional. Seems to me legislators never want to strike at the root of the problem which is "criminal misuse" of the product or products. We need a new breed of legislators.