Oregon Oregon 13 trial starts today

[PiratePast40]

https://oregoncourts.mediasite.com/...ault/watch/d59f7d86ff854867a7fcf437339cfe6e1d

Starting now

Read More

 

[PiratePast40]

They said that court was adjourned and didn't give a date or time for reconvening. I don't see the case on any future schedules, so what does that mean? Court calendar

ETA: Today was opening arguments.

 

[Lazyfaire]

What is this case about?

 

[bcp]

https://katu.com/resources/pdf/aa897c39-dce5-40db-95dc-8d1b342409bd-KNOPPBRRSBOOKMARKSS070456TIM.pdf

Bruce

 

[Yarome]

What is this case about?

113 is the one barring elected officials from re-election if they have 10 or more "unexcused" absences. The anti-walkout bill.

Basically the left shutting down any recourse for the minority GOP to interfere/shut down their totalitarian agenda. The court case is challenging the legality of the "if you oppose our will... we end you" bill.

Not having anything further currently on the calendar... I dunno. The left playing games to slow walk the case with "scheduling conflicts"(?) It's not an unknown tactic when trying to keep tyrannical laws/regulations on the books for as long as possible, but that's just supposition on my part.

 

[VinnieBoomBah]

What is this case about?

Federal judge denies preliminary injunction to Republican senators seeking to run for reelection after walkout

The federal case can move forward despite the ruling denying a preliminary injunction.

www.oregonlive.com

 

[Lazyfaire]

113 is the one barring elected officials from re-election if they have 10 or more "unexcused" absences. The anti-walkout bill.

Basically the left shutting down any recourse for the minority GOP to interfere/shut down their totalitarian agenda. The court case is challenging the legality of the "if you oppose our will... we end you" bill.

Not having anything further currently on the calendar... I dunno. The left playing games to slow walk the case with "scheduling conflicts"(?) It's not an unknown tactic when trying to keep tyrannical laws/regulations on the books for as long as possible, but that's just supposition on my part.

Thanks

 

[PiratePast40]

113 is the one barring elected officials from re-election if they have 10 or more "unexcused" absences. The anti-walkout bill.

Basically the left shutting down any recourse for the minority GOP to interfere/shut down their totalitarian agenda. The court case is challenging the legality of the "if you oppose our will... we end you" bill.

Not having anything further currently on the calendar... I dunno. The left playing games to slow walk the case with "scheduling conflicts"(?) It's not an unknown tactic when trying to keep tyrannical laws/regulations on the books for as long as possible, but that's just supposition on my part.

From the article:
"Arguments in that case are scheduled before the Oregon Supreme Court in Salem on Thursday afternoon, with a decision following."

Sounds like they only have a short time to present their oral arguments and then the court goes into their discussions in private.

 

[Gbirk]

From the article:
"Arguments in that case are scheduled before the Oregon Supreme Court in Salem on Thursday afternoon, with a decision following."

Sounds like they only have a short time to present their oral arguments and then the court goes into their discussions in private.

The SC does not need much time. The decision has already been made..........

 

[GrayGoose]

Basically the left shutting down any recourse for the minority GOP to interfere/shut down their totalitarian agenda.

But it is okay to pull the fire alarm though. Oh wait, wrong party of "tolerance".

 

[Yarome]

From the article:
"Arguments in that case are scheduled before the Oregon Supreme Court in Salem on Thursday afternoon, with a decision following."

Sounds like they only have a short time to present their oral arguments and then the court goes into their discussions in private.

The SC does not need much time. The decision has already been made..........

The oral argument does seem pretty pro forma, doesn't it.

When they own the legislature and the courts there is little incentive for them to observe archaic democratic or judicial processes based on "nuisance laws".... right.