Just something ive been thinking about.
Some have expressed thoughts that since San Bernandino is a terrorism case, rather than a delusional madman, it does nothing to support or hurts the argument for stricter gun laws.
I was wondering if it actually gives more leeway to circumvent the legislative process and impose new regulations in the name of national security?
Yes, no, maybe so?
Some have expressed thoughts that since San Bernandino is a terrorism case, rather than a delusional madman, it does nothing to support or hurts the argument for stricter gun laws.
I was wondering if it actually gives more leeway to circumvent the legislative process and impose new regulations in the name of national security?
Yes, no, maybe so?