Mcdonald v Chicago

Discussion in 'Legal & Political Archive' started by Adam12, Oct 3, 2013.

  1. Adam12

    Adam12
    Oregon
    Active Member

    Messages:
    225
    Likes Received:
    54
  2. Dunerunner

    Dunerunner
    You'll Never Know
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,473
    Likes Received:
    1,238
    Boyer should be disbarred. He is essentially saying that you have no right to self preservation, no right to protect your private property, and no right to take up arms to defend your freedom.
     
  3. Adam12

    Adam12
    Oregon
    Active Member

    Messages:
    225
    Likes Received:
    54
    Well, I believe Breyer is arguing that restrictions (in this case bans) may not, in and of themselves, inhibit the second amendment. Obviously flawed thinking but not too flawed in light of case law.
     

Share This Page