- Messages
- 122
- Reactions
- 198
Brazil, India and Mexico are #2, 3, and 4 in total deaths. Is that 3rd world enough for you?
Do you even read the stuff you post before posting it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Brazil, India and Mexico are #2, 3, and 4 in total deaths. Is that 3rd world enough for you?
You're not an immunologist so nobody cares about your armchair opinion gathered from who knows where. Post an actual link to a peer reviewed study about these so called "dangers". Nobody here has because nobody can... it doesn't exist.I could have received the shot already but have no desire to get it, for many of the reasons already mentioned, but it boils down to this.
Brazil, India and Mexico are #2, 3, and 4 in total deaths. Is that 3rd world enough for you?
Do you even read the stuff you post before posting it?
Pretty convenient the flu just disappeared. it must have been from all the people getting vaccinated for over a decade.
No people, no disease. Problem solved!
That's great. You're an advocate of the vaccine. You're ok with the basic premise of "well, we don't know what will happen if you get our vaccine, you may or may not get coronavirus, you may or may not be able to spread it, but you really should take it even though we don't exactly know what the outcome will be. And you need to keep wearing your face mask anyways, maybe even 2or more because, hey, we're just going with the science. Maybe. Kinda"You're not an immunologist so nobody cares about your armchair opinion gathered from who knows where. Post an actual link to a peer reviewed study about these so called "dangers". Nobody here has because nobody can... it doesn't exist.
There is plenty of peer reviewed data about the vaccines, their safety and efficacy: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
I'm surprised so many people here read the same old anti-vax conspiracy theories and accept it as truth without a critical thought of their own.
You have a less than 1% chance of dying in a car accident. Do you wear a seatbelt?
Who's premise is that? Your own made up one, or one backed by research you can link?That's great. You're an advocate of the vaccine. You're ok with the basic premise of "well, we don't know what will happen if you get our vaccine, you may or may not get coronavirus, you may or may not be able to spread it, but you really should take it even though we don't exactly know what the outcome will be. And you need to keep wearing your face mask anyways, maybe even 2or more because, hey, we're just going with the science. Maybe. Kinda"
So you're telling me the United States has an abnormally high death rate? Good to know.India isn't a really a great example to prove your point because they actually have a remarkably low death rate. But I'm sure you know all about that.
It's so much simpler than that. All my life, if you got vaccinated, it meant you won't get whatever it was you were being vaccinated against.
Vaccine efficacy measures how well a vaccine worked at preventing disease during a well-managed clinical trial. The number is an estimate, designed to give a general sense of how good shot protection may be.
To reach it, researchers look at all the people in a vaccine trial who get sick during the study period. They then quantify what percentage of them were vaccinated or not. Both Moderna and Pfizer said that roughly 95% of the people who got sick with COVID-19 during their trials had not received vaccines, while 5% had.
That does not mean that a vaccine is going to be 95% effective at stamping out all disease, even the asymptomatic kind. It does not mean that 5% of vaccinated people globally will get sick. And it does not mean that, once you are fully vaccinated, you have a 5% risk of getting COVID-19.
At best, it provides a temporary snapshot, a vaccine maker's rough estimate as to how well their vaccine will perform at curbing symptomatic infections in the general public, based on just a few months worth of trial data.
Who's premise is that? Your own made up one, or one backed by research you can link?
Apparently 85% of us don't need it anyway? To me that actually seems like the most cautious approach, or maybe I'm just too paranoid and ignorant about our cutting edge but improperly tested vaccine
That's never been 100% true.
Polio vax was termed to be 99% effective. But flu vax is only somewhere between 27%-83% (trivalent and live attenuated). https://www.who.int/influenza_vaccines_plan/resources/Session4_VEfficacy_VEffectiveness.PDF
The two mRNA vaccines were 95%-96% effective in their studies. The J&J vaccine (adenovirus 26 method) is somewhere between 50% and 67% effective.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/me...acy-rates-of-coronavirus-vaccines/ar-BB1bjwJx
FL eased restrictions in September 2020 when the average case count was 2,500 per day. They rose steadily and peaked in January 2021 at 20,000 cases per day. That's a 700% increase. Do you even check the facts before you type?FL has eased restrictions and neither has seen significant increases
FL eased restrictions in September 2020 when the average case count was 2,500 per day. They rose steadily and peaked in January 2021 at 20,000 cases per day. That's a 700% increase. Do you even check the facts before you type?
FL eased restrictions in September 2020 when the average case count was 2,500 per day. They rose steadily and peaked in January 2021 at 20,000 cases per day. That's a 700% increase. Do you even check the facts before you type?
Do you check your tone before you hit the Post button?FL eased restrictions in September 2020 when the average case count was 2,500 per day. They rose steadily and peaked in January 2021 at 20,000 cases per day. That's a 700% increase. Do you even check the facts before you type?
I like arguing with that new guy who's rude to everyone, but not with you. I like you. I'm going to try to keep this more like a discussion.
I was speaking in generalities. I agree that no cure or vaccine is ever 100% effective. They're made by humans. The figures you quoted notwithstanding, we've been told by Fauci that you can still get the China Virus even if you get vaccinated, so you still have to wear masks and social distance. Meanwhile SD has never locked down, FL has eased restrictions and neither has seen significant increases. A flue with a 99.96% survival rate and our leaders are acting like it's an extinction event.
Also this (totally different part of the issue, I know, but please read it) :
COVID death data fraud
I've had enough. The media continue to report what they consider the death toll from the Wuhan virus, despite the fact that it is fiction and defies basic tenets of scientific integrity. Back in October, Senator Hirono repea...www.americanthinker.com
Because not everyone is getting on board with lockdowns or masks.
Because not everyone is getting on board with lockdowns or masks.