Silver Supporter
- Messages
- 6,072
- Reactions
- 15,024
That shows your misunderstandings of the two "systems". Communism has to murder people eventually when people wake up and see how oppressive it is.
Capitalism may kill a few people, but it doesn't mean to, killing is counterproductive.
Capitalism is a word I don't really like because it has a sinister connotation of greedy traders who, like communists, don't actually produce anything.
I don't really think there is a name for what I see producing all the real wealth in the world, entrepreneurialism comes close, free market is very close but has never existed for long.
What does the murder of anyone do to increase production? Fear is the calling card of communists, not producers. Communism is another name for thieves, thievery and intimidation have always been related.
To answer you, not many. Many billions have been made wealthier, happier and more comfortable by entrepenurialism.
Capitalism involves the conversion of raw materials into goods. The profit element is the result of taking advantage of the difference between the total cost of raw materials plus labor, and the selling price of the finished goods. Capitalism requires the availability of cheap raw materials and cheap labor. Capitalism is willing to kill people to acquire and maintain cheap raw materials. Most of our wars have been fought under the guise of national security or religion, but in the end they are always about acquisition of raw materials. So yes, capitalism has killed a lot of people.
That's not to say that all capitalism is always bad. It is unrestrained capitalism, when companies and corporations become so powerful that they dictate public policy that we begin to go off the rails. Capitalism that is required to provide for worker safety, that is required to provide ethical compensation to its workers, that is prohibited from eliminating its own competition, and that is required to contribute to the common good is an admirable economic model.
I have no use for socialism, and the results of communism speak for themselves. But there are certain responsibilities that a civilized society must take upon itself. People should not be allowed to sleep and starve in the streets. People should not be allowed to die for lack of medical care. Old people who can no longer work need to be cared for, not discarded. People should be able to aspire to advance their own economic condition and that of their children.
There are many things a great society needs that cannot be accomplished on a voluntary or profit driven basis. An interstate highway system cannot be built by volunteers who donate property and labor. An adequate common defense cannot be paid for with bake sales. We vote to levy taxes on ourselves to do these things. The argument is simply over which things we need to do that fall into that category. When these endeavors have been left to the forces of capitalism these services are provided only where there is a profit to be made. Airline regulation was instituted to ensure that necessary service was provided even in areas where it was less profitable. If highway construction was left to toll road companies we would not have highways to unprofitable areas. Presently, health care is left to profit driven providers, and we see exactly the same result. Those on whom the health care providers cannot make a profit go without care, and therefor suffer and die needlessly. I can't say without reserve that I am a capitalist. I would say that I'm a limited capitalist.