Goes to the Senate for first reading. Then as soon as Tina Tampon signs it.so I better get that new upper now then...
does the law go immediately into effect?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Goes to the Senate for first reading. Then as soon as Tina Tampon signs it.so I better get that new upper now then...
does the law go immediately into effect?
isnt that tomorrow?Goes to the Senate for first reading. Then as soon as Tina Tampon signs it.
Dunno.isnt that tomorrow?
Has to go through Senate then t Gov's desk first.so I better get that new upper now then...
does the law go immediately into effeffect
Exactly."...in accordance with federal law." That's the sticking point. There is no Federal Law about serializing anything but the frame of a complete firearm. Tough to be in accordance with something that doesn't exist.
My guess is various companies and individuals will still sell and ship into Oregon, uppers, but we'll see.This is meant to halt the sale and importation of uppers in Oregon.
Of course they will, and they SHOULD. You can't not sell based on a state law that requires Federal Law guidelines, if those guidelines are not in place, nor the law.My guess is various companies and individuals will still sell and ship into Oregon uppers but we'll see.
what they should and what they actually do can be two different things. Some companies wont sell Oregon magazines even though its still, for now, legal.Of course they will, and they SHOULD. You can't not sell based on a state law that requires Federal Law guidelines, if those guidelines are not in place, nor the law.
Best get on your ordering.what they should and what they actually do can be two different things. Some companies wont sell Oregon magazines even though its still, for now, legal.
Yup. A bucket list item just got pulled to the top...Best get on your ordering.
As we have learned with recent ATF prosecutions I suspect they just need to prove intent. If you have files on your computer or have the stl loaded to an usb stick or in the memory of the printer. If they want to make an example of ya then perhaps they have enough to convict you under a jury of your peers. It is a wild world we live in. The original details of the ghost gun law had it take place immediately so at least that got moved off until September of 24 allowing the courts and folks with these to react.The mere possession of an 80% lower or frame will make you a criminal. Hve two and it'll be a felony. What will happen if you have a 3D printer, filiment, and software? Will that also be enough to send you ro jail? Will a block of aluminum or plastic with a sketch of a frame or receiver on it be enough?
A great many politicians and lawyers wearing black robes seem to think that the 2A meansJust an FYI if you are emailing folks about this, be kind and understand they see the constitution differently and the existing supreme court's interruptions as not legitimate. It seems to be a conversation killer.
I see that your questions prompted them to change HB 2002B. I've come to the conclusion that they truly and honestly don't care what we have to say. A pat on the head with a little "that's nice dear" doesn't do anything and people need to recognize how much of an idiot they think you are.As we have learned with recent ATF prosecutions I suspect they just need to prove intent. If you have files on your computer or have the stl loaded to an usb stick or in the memory of the printer. If they want to make an example of ya then perhaps they have enough to convict you under a jury of your peers. It is a wild world we live in. The original details of the ghost gun law had it take place immediately so at least that got moved off until September of 24 allowing the courts and folks with these to react.
California has a process to obtain a serial number prior to home manufacture from the state. While I hate all of this I think this is much fairer as it allows home built firearms. I asked several of those writing the bill in an email why if they felt this way they didn't adapt the California system. When I asked about the constitutionality of making your own firearms the emails stopped Just an FYI if you are emailing folks about this, be kind and understand they see the constitution differently and the existing supreme court's interruptions as not legitimate. It seems to be a conversation killer.
At what point do you need to take the block to an ffl to be serialized? How do you embed a serial tag into a 3d printed frame. This basically outlaws the home construction of a firearm without an ffl. I suspect as other courts have ruled that this will be seen as unconstitutional: https://thereload.com/federal-judge-partially-blocks-delaware-ghost-gun-law/
The liberal elite.I tried that too, and in the end, it became obvious that they were being insulting and condescending.
Lol I agree. I don't think anyone could argue that I am an idiot and it is a fool's errand. I had to try and figured if enough had an outrage such as what happened with sb3501 that there may be an impact.I see that your questions prompted them to change HB 2002B. I've come to the conclusion that they truly and honestly don't care what we have to say. A pat on the head with a little "that's nice dear" doesn't do anything and people need to recognize how much of an idiot they think you are.
Better get an instant today or I'm going to have a Stacatto in no man's land.Don't forget that the 3 day release ends with HB2005 too.