- Messages
- 351
- Reactions
- 130
Hi fd15k,
It seems that the District Court Justice didn't realize that "self-defense" might be a "lawful purpose". Or perhaps he desired to throw legal BS in between us and our rights.
Some of them do appear to be coming around though, like Judge Clegg, in Maryland ("... the RIGHT is the only justification needed ...") (This one is too obvious, and should lead to "may issue" falling like apples from a tree in a windstorm!)
I have noticed that the local post office posted § 930, but they didn't show the whole statute - specifically they left out the exceptions which are given in § 930(d)(3). They didn't post the other (postal) statute which supposedly prohibits weapons.
It seems that the District Court Justice didn't realize that "self-defense" might be a "lawful purpose". Or perhaps he desired to throw legal BS in between us and our rights.
Some of them do appear to be coming around though, like Judge Clegg, in Maryland ("... the RIGHT is the only justification needed ...") (This one is too obvious, and should lead to "may issue" falling like apples from a tree in a windstorm!)
I have noticed that the local post office posted § 930, but they didn't show the whole statute - specifically they left out the exceptions which are given in § 930(d)(3). They didn't post the other (postal) statute which supposedly prohibits weapons.