- Messages
- 3,267
- Reactions
- 4,909
Taku
Thanks for watching.
Since that C130 ride in 1979, every wakeup (even the bad ones) are a bonus!
Thanks for watching.
Since that C130 ride in 1979, every wakeup (even the bad ones) are a bonus!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe there is no change in your area, did you check the map?
Follow the money.Why is it the same people seem to be the ones that promoted nuclear power as safe are the same ones that promoted that global warming was a scam, and seem to be the ones that promote that universal health will bankrupt future generations?
Perhaps, but then the U.S. has dumped radioactive waste off the Farallon Islands since the 1940's (waste was part of the U.S. nuclear weapons work being done in the 1940's, 1950's and 1960's.
Something is way off here.
If radiation is spiking in those places I have a hunch why,....but...time will tell.
Take my thoughts with a grain of salt and look for yourself. I could be way off, but
seems like they added 2+2 and came up with 7 in that alert and image today.
Look at the patterns from Chernobyl
<broken link removed>
It was a hell of a lot hotter than Japan.
and here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MU4_bJT8W3Y
Chernobyl Fallout Maps from the BBC | radioactive monticello
Inside Chernobyl, The Long Shadow of Chernobyl - National Geographic Magazine
US
Chernobyl Annotated Bibliography
-------------------
From Fukishima
And if it is related to precip patterns then the snowpack should be hot as hell......but...no.
Fukushima Radiation Levels Will Concentrate in Pockets at Specific US and Canada West Coast Locations | Global Research
<broken link removed>
<broken link removed>
What I have been reading claims that Fukushima is at least 100 times hotter than chernobyl
anyway if the map is accurate the US has been bombarded with radiation. I don't see that fact changing. How is that lawsuit against Tepco for shortening our pursuit of happiness coming along? Can we go back to those coal powered plants yet?
Remember the Gregory Peck movie, 'On the Beach'?
Maybe it's time to panic the people?
Just curious, what type of instrument are you using? GM tube, proportional counter, scintillation probe, microR meter, count rate meter?I get bigger deviations with solar flares :-\
Just curious, what type of instrument are you using? GM tube, proportional counter, scintillation probe, microR meter, count rate meter?
Not being a smart azz, just wondering what the general population is using.
Again I checked the trees, shrubs, ground and much of the area. The levels are the same as they have been for the past 5 or 6 years here. NO Change
taku wrote:
I do not think that background radiation is the biggest concern. The BIG concern to me is that ionizing radiation is getting into the food chain. Alpha and low level beta particles are more easily blocked, and do major damage to tissue. Kept outside the body, the hazard is minimized. Once into the body, then any cell, any organ, any tissue is at elevated risk of damage/destruction. The ocean is the source of all life on this planet. Poison the ocean and all life becomes poisoned. It is a big ocean and there are those that shout 'Low level', 'No risk', 'It is just a cycle', .... By the time it becomes known as a risk, the inertia is so great, there is really no stopping it. A few make billions, while the rest eat it. This is nothing new, the only thing new is that rich cannot avoid the effects forever. Radiation related illness dose is cumulative. It never goes away, it merely keeps adding onto itself.
Sorry if this has already been commented on, but this is a long thread. I'm wondering if anyone has considered using prophylactic potassium iodide? Any medical experts, or anybody else, care to chime in on that idea? I'd appreciate your thoughts.